ReviewPatient preference and adherence2016
The impact of patient support programs on adherence, clinical, humanistic, and economic patient outcomes: a targeted systematic review.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adherence to Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treatment.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of patient support programmes among patients with severe asthma treated with biological therapies: a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Level of adherence to prescribed exercise in spondyloarthritis and factors affecting this adherence: a systematic review.Rheumatology international · 2019Pooled it
- Telemedicine-Based Health Coaching Is Effective for Inducing Weight Loss and Improving Metabolic Markers.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019Trial
- Embracing Digital as a Paradigm Shift in Medical Affairs.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Review
- Attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the use of parenteral methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Real-World Impact of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Early Intervention Among Older Patients With Lung Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting Long-Term Weight Loss Using Self-Reported, Digitally Collected, Real-World Data After Initiation of Semaglutide for Overweight or Obesity.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Tildrakizumab Treatment Patterns in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Retrospective Analysis From the Canadian Patient Support Program.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- An Access-Focused Patient-Centric Value Assessment Framework for Medication Formulary Decision-Making in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Prevalence of mental health disorders and their association with chronic physical diseases in Kuwait.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Racial disparities in acute care utilization among individuals with myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Recovery environments in places of daily living: a scoping review and conceptual analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Digital Solutions Available to Be Used by Informal Caregivers, Contributing to Medication Adherence: A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Expert Recommendations to Bridge Gaps in Heart Failure Patient Support in the Middle East and Africa Region.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2024Review
- Prevalence and nature of manufacturer-sponsored patient support programs for prescription drugs in Canada: a cross-sectional study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- Best Practices for the Management of Patients with Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease According to a German Nationwide Analysis of Expert Centers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient support programs (PSPs), including medication management and counseling, have the potential to improve care in chronic disease states with complex therapies. Little is known about the program's effects on improving clinical, adherence, humanistic, and cost outcomes. PURPOSE: To conduct a targeted review describing medical conditions in which PSPs have been implemented; support delivery components (eg, face-to-face, phone, mail, and internet); and outcomes associated with implementation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE - 10 years through March 2015 with supplemental handsearching of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: English-language trials and observational studies of PSPs providing at minimum, counseling for medication management, measurement of ≥1 clinical outcome, and a 3-month follow-up period during which outcomes were measured. DATA EXTRACTION: Program characteristics and related clinical, adherence, humanistic, and cost outcomes were abstracted. Study quality and the overall strength of evidence were reviewed using standard criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 2,239 citations, 64 studies met inclusion criteria. All targeted chronic disease processes and the majority (48 [75%]) of programs offered in-clinic, face-to-face support. All but 9 (14.1%) were overseen by allied health care professionals (eg, nurses, pharmacists, paraprofessionals). Forty-one (64.1%) reported at least one significantly positive clinical outcome. The most frequent clinical outcome impacted was adherence, where 27 of 41 (66%) reported a positive outcome. Of 42 studies measuring humanistic outcomes (eg, quality of life, functional status), 27 (64%) reported significantly positive outcomes. Only 15 (23.4%) programs reported cost or utilization-related outcomes, and, of these, 12 reported positive impacts.
conclusionThe preponderance of evidence suggests a positive impact of PSPs on adherence, clinical and humanistic outcomes. Although less often measured, health care utilization and costs are also reduced following PSP implementation. Further research is needed to better quantify which support programs, delivery methods, and components offer the greatest value for any particular medical condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.