Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27175069›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2016

Using the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression with mental health inpatients: a feasibility study.

Tella Lantta, Raija Kontio, Michael Daffern, Clive E Adams, Maritta Välimäki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Updates in the Assessment and Management of Agitation.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tella LanttaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Raija KontioDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland; Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.
Michael DaffernCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science (CFBS), Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clive E AdamsInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Maritta VälimäkiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper aims to explore the acceptability of Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA) from the perspective of patients, its actual use by mental health nurses, and the predictive validity of the DASA instrument.

methodsA feasibility study design incorporating quantitative and qualitative components was used. The study was conducted in three mental health inpatient units at three hospitals in southern Finland. Quantitative data were used to explore demand (nurses' actual use of the DASA), limited efficacy (predictive validity), and acceptability (measured through patients' participation in the project). Qualitative data were collected to enhance the understanding of acceptability by describing patients' perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the DASA.

resultsNurses used the DASA for most patient assessments. The predictive validity of the DASA was outstanding or excellent, depending on the type of aggression predicted, although the patient recruitment ratio was low. Patients reported both strengths and weaknesses of the DASA, providing complementary information regarding the instrument's acceptability and clinical application.

conclusionThe DASA accurately predicts inpatient aggression. The patients' preferences and concerns regarding risk assessment have been noted. More patient involvement in risk assessment research and violence prevention efforts is required.

Indexed as

multi-method approachnursespatient participationpsychiatric hospitalsrisk assessmentviolence

Identifiers

PMID27175069
PMCPMC4854232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.