Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27174924›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2016

Morphometric differences between central vs. surface acini in A/J mice using high-resolution micro-computed tomography.

Abhilash S Kizhakke Puliyakote, Dragoş M Vasilescu, John D Newell, Ge Wang, Ewald R Weibel, Eric A Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Development of the lung.Cell and tissue research · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abhilash S Kizhakke PuliyakoteDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;
Dragoş M VasilescuDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;
John D NewellDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;
Ge WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia;
Ewald R WeibelUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eric A HoffmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; eric-hoffman@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
Multi-center Structural & Functional Quantitative CT Pulmonary PhenotypingR01HL112986 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOFFMAN, ERIC ALFRED · 2012 to 2016
$4.6M
Nodestruction Multi-Scale Micro-CT Imaging SystemS10OD018503 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SIEREN, JESSICA C · 2015 to 2015
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112986NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605NIH HHS S10 OD018503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through interior tomography, high-resolution microcomputed tomography (μCT) systems provide the ability to nondestructively assess the pulmonary acinus at micron and submicron resolutions. With the application of systematic uniform random sampling (SURS) principles applied to in situ fixed, intact, ex vivo lungs, we have sought to characterize morphometric differences in central vs. surface acini to better understand how well surface acini reflect global acinar geometry. Lungs from six mice (A/J strain, 15-20 wk of age) were perfusion fixed in situ and imaged using a multiresolution μCT system (Micro XCT 400, Zeiss). With the use of lower-resolution whole lung images, SURS methods were used for identification of central and surface foci for high-resolution imaging. Acinar morphometric metrics included diameters, lengths, and branching angles for each alveolar duct and total path lengths from entrance of the acinus to the terminal alveolar sacs. In addition, acinar volume, alveolar surface area, and surface area/volume ratios were assessed. A generation-based analysis demonstrated that central acini have significantly smaller branch diameters at each generation with no significant increase in branch lengths. In addition to larger-diameter alveolar ducts, surface acini had significantly increased numbers of branches and terminal alveolar sacs. The total path lengths from the acinar entrance to the terminal nodes were found to be higher in the case of surface acini. Volumes and surface areas of surface acini are greater than central acini, but there were no differences in surface/volume ratios. In conclusion, there are significant structural differences between surface and central acini in the A/J mouse.

Indexed as

Acinar CellsAnimalsMicePulmonary AlveoliX-Ray Microtomographyacinar structurecentral line-based morphometrylung parenchymapulmonary imagingquantitative CTsystematic uniform random sampling

Identifiers

PMID27174924
PMCPMC4967250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.