Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27174776›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

Effects of ozone therapy on facial nerve regeneration.

Isa Ozbay, Ilker Ital, Cuneyt Kucur, Raziye Akcılar, Aysenur Deger, Savas Aktas, Fatih Oghan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects of ozone and methylprednisolone treatment in facial paralysis: An experimental study.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The role of antioxidants in facial nerve injury.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation of targeted oxidative stress induced by oxygen-ozoneRedox report : communications in free radical research · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Air pollution by NOScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isa OzbayDumlupinar University, Department of Otolaryngology, Kutahya, Turkey. Electronic address: isaozbay@gmail.com.
Ilker ItalDumlupinar University, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kutahya, Turkey.
Cuneyt KucurDumlupinar University, Department of Otolaryngology, Kutahya, Turkey.
Raziye AkcılarDumlupinar University, Department of Physiology, Kutahya, Turkey.
Aysenur DegerDumlupinar University, Department of Pathology, Kutahya, Turkey.
Savas AktasMersin University, Department of Histology and Embryology, Mersin, Turkey.
Fatih OghanDumlupinar University, Department of Otolaryngology, Kutahya, Turkey.
Dumlupinar University · TRMersin Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOzone may promote moderate oxidative stress, which increases antioxidant endogenous systems. There are a number of antioxidants that have been investigated therapeutically for improving peripheral nerve regeneration. However, no previous studies have reported the effect of ozone therapy on facial nerve regeneration.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effect of ozone therapy on facial nerve regeneration.

methodsFourteen Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into two groups with experimental nerve crush injuries: a control group, which received saline treatment post-crush, and an experimental group, which received ozone treatment. All animals underwent surgery in which the left facial nerve was exposed and crushed. Treatment with saline or ozone began on the day of the nerve crush. Left facial nerve stimulation thresholds were measured before crush, immediately after crush, and after 30 days. After measuring nerve stimulation thresholds at 30 days post-injury, the crushed facial nerve was excised. All specimens were studied using light and electron microscopy.

resultsPost-crushing, the ozone-treated group had lower stimulation thresholds than the saline group. Although this did not achieve statistical significance, it is indicative of greater functional improvement in the ozone group. Significant differences were found in vascular congestion, macrovacuolization, and myelin thickness between the ozone and control groups. Significant differences were also found in axonal degeneration and myelin ultrastructure between the two groups.

conclusionWe found that ozone therapy exerted beneficial effect on the regeneration of crushed facial nerves in rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFacial Nerve InjuriesNerve RegenerationOzoneRatsRats, WistarOzoneFacial nerveNervo facialOzoneOzônioRegeneraçãoRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID27174776
PMCPMC9442687
OpenAlexW2342393711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.