Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27174567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Branched Peptide, B2088, Disrupts the Supramolecular Organization of Lipopolysaccharides and Sensitizes the Gram-negative Bacteria.

Rajamani Lakshminarayanan, Wei Xiang Tan, Thet Tun Aung, Eunice Tze Leng Goh, Nandhakumar Muruganantham, Jianguo Li, Jamie Ya Ting Chang, Neha Dikshit, Padmanabhan Saraswathi, Rayne Rui Lim and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interest of Homodialkyl Neamine Derivatives against ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Double-Headed Cationic Lipopeptides: An Emerging Class of Antimicrobials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rajamani LakshminarayananSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Wei Xiang TanNational University of Singapore, Department of Pharmacy, Singapore.
Thet Tun AungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Eunice Tze Leng GohSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Nandhakumar MurugananthamSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Jianguo LiSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Jamie Ya Ting ChangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Neha DikshitDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Padmanabhan SaraswathiSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Rayne Rui LimSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Tse Siang KangNational University of Singapore, Department of Pharmacy, Singapore.
Vanniarajan BalamuralidharDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Bindu SukumaranDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Chandra S VermaAgency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Bioinformatics Institute, Singapore.
Jayaraman SivaramanNational University of Singapore, Department of Biological Sciences, Singapore.
Shyam Sunder ChaurasiaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Shouping LiuSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.
Roger W BeuermanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Ocular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissecting the complexities of branched peptide-lipopolysaccharides (LPS) interactions provide rationale for the development of non-cytotoxic antibiotic adjuvants. Using various biophysical methods, we show that the branched peptide, B2088, binds to lipid A and disrupts the supramolecular organization of LPS. The disruption of outer membrane in an intact bacterium was demonstrated by fluorescence spectroscopy and checkerboard assays, the latter confirming strong to moderate synergism between B2088 and various classes of antibiotics. The potency of synergistic combinations of B2088 and antibiotics was further established by time-kill kinetics, mammalian cell culture infections model and in vivo model of bacterial keratitis. Importantly, B2088 did not show any cytotoxicity to corneal epithelial cells for at least 96 h continuous exposure or hemolytic activity even at 20 mg/ml. Peptide congeners containing norvaline, phenylalanine and tyrosine (instead of valine in B2088) displayed better synergism compared to other substitutions. We propose that high affinity and subsequent disruption of the supramolecular assembly of LPS by the branched peptides are vital for the development of non-cytotoxic antibiotic adjuvants that can enhance the accessibility of conventional antibiotics to the intracellular targets, decrease the antibiotic consumption and holds promise in averting antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacterial LoadDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansKeratitisLipopolysaccharidesMiceMolecular Dynamics SimulationSpectrometry, FluorescenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesB2088 peptideLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID27174567
PMCPMC4865820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.