Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27174549›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2016

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus other video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques: a randomized study.

Valerio Perna, Angel Francisco Carvajal, Juan Antonio Torrecilla, Orlando Gigirey

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stapler-Less Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. How will lung cancer screening and lung nodule management change the diagnostic and surgical lung cancer landscape?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. UniportalJournal of thoracic disease · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valerio PernaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Son Espases Carretera de Valldemossa, Palma, Spain v.perna@hotmail.com.
Angel Francisco CarvajalDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Son Espases Carretera de Valldemossa, Palma, Spain.
Juan Antonio TorrecillaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Son Espases Carretera de Valldemossa, Palma, Spain.
Orlando GigireyDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Son Espases Carretera de Valldemossa, Palma, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA prospective, randomized study was carried out on patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, with the aim of determining if uniportal video-assisted lobectomy has more favourable postoperative outcomes than other video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques (Duke approach and Copenhagen approach).

methodsPatients were randomly assigned to two groups; uniportal video-assisted lobectomy (Group A; n = 51) and other video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques (Group B; n = 55). The primary outcome measures were: postoperative pain (analogue visual scale) and supplementary doses of analgesics (morphine, milligrams); the secondary outcome measures were: the delay in removing the paravertebral catheter and the chest drain, the duration of the postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and the operative or 30-day mortality. We assessed postoperative pain during the first 3 days to identify possible differences coinciding with paravertebral catheter removal and with the start of mobilization, and we evaluated the type of resection, R0/R1 (a very important factor in assessing postoperative pain). All continuous data were evaluated for normality, and analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-tests or t-tests. Categorical data were analysed by Fisher's exact test.

resultsOne hundred and six lobectomies were completed. Both groups were comparable with respect to different clinical parameters (age, clinical stage and comorbidity), preoperative and pathological variables. The median visual analogue pain score in the first 3 days did not show statistically significant differences (respectively, P = 0.58, P = 0.64, P = 0.85). Likewise, the median morphine use in the first 3 days did not show statistically significant differences (respectively, P = 0.72, P = 0.81, P = 0.64). There was no difference in timing to remove the paravertebral catheter (P = 0.82) and the chest drain (P = 0.65) and the duration of the postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.62). There was no difference in postoperative complications (one reoperation for bleeding in Group B, P = 0.24). There was no operative or 30-day mortality in either group.

conclusionsUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy does not present better postoperative outcomes than other video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesics, OpioidDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLength of StayLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePain MeasurementPneumonectomyPostoperative CarePostoperative PainProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineComplicationLung cancer surgeryPainSurgerySurgery/incision/exposure/techniquesThoracoscopy/VATS

Identifiers

PMID27174549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.