Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequence of the Pezizomycete Pyronema confluens.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Mitochondrial Genome of the Phytopathogenic FungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
   Article
2. The 287,403 bp Mitochondrial Genome of Ectomycorrhizal FungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
   Article
3. Evidence of Extensive Intraspecific Noncoding Reshuffling in a 169-kb Mitochondrial Genome of a Basidiomycetous Fungus.Genome biology and evolution · 2019
   Article
4. Comparison of the Mitochondrial Genome Sequences of SixFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract