Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27174220›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Current knowledge on the sensitivity of the (68)Ga-somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography and the SUVmax reference range for management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Irene Virgolini, Michael Gabriel, Alexander Kroiss, Elisabeth von Guggenberg, Rupert Prommegger, Boris Warwitz, Bernhard Nilica, Llanos Geraldo Roig, Margarida Rodrigues, Christian Uprimny

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Biodistribution ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Added value of [European radiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Functional imaging in ectopic Cushing syndrome.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2020
    Review
  9. Comparative evaluation ofEJNMMI research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Guideline for PET/CT imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene VirgoliniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. irene.virgolini@i-med.ac.at.
Michael GabrielDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexander KroissDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elisabeth von GuggenbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Rupert PrommeggerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Boris WarwitzDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard NilicaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Llanos Geraldo RoigDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Margarida RodriguesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian UprimnyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically increased pancreatic uptake at the head/uncinate process is observed in more than one-third of patients after injection of one of the three (68)Ga-labelled octreotide-based peptides used for somatostatin (sst) receptor (r) imaging. There are minor differences between these (68)Ga-sstr-binding peptides in the imaging setting. On (68)Ga-sstr-imaging the physiological uptake can be diffuse or focal and usually remains stable over time. Differences in the maximal standardised uptake values (SUVmax) reported for the normal pancreas as well as for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET) lesions may be related to several factors, including (a) differences in the peptide binding affinities as well as differences in sstr subtype expression of pancreatic α- and β-cells, and heterogeneity / density of tumour cells, (b) differences in scanner resolution, image reconstruction techniques and acquisition protocols, (c) mostly retrospective study designs, (d) mixed patient populations, or (e) interference with medications such as treatment with long-acting sst analogues. The major limitation in most of the studies lies in the lack of histopathological confirmation of abnormal findings. There is a significant overlap between the calculated SUVmax-values for physiological pancreas and PNET-lesions of the head/uncinate process that do not favour the use of quantitative parameters in the clinical setting. Anecdotal long-term follow-up studies have even indicated that increased uptake in the head/uncinate process still can turn out to be malignant over years of follow up. SUVmax-data for the pancreatic body and tail are limited. Therefore, any visible focal tracer uptake in the pancreas must be considered as suspicious for malignancy irrespective of quantitative parameters. In general, sstr-PET/CT has significant implications for the management of NET patients leading to a change in treatment decision in about one-third of patients. Therefore, follow-up with (68)Ga-sstr-PET/CT is mandatory in the clinical setting if uptake in the head/uncinate process is observed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEvidence-Based MedicineGallium RadioisotopesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMolecular ImagingNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotidePancreatic NeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorGallium RadioisotopesOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Somatostatin68Ga-somatostatin analogueNeuroendocrine tumourPancreatic imagingSensitivitySpecificitySUVmax-calculationUncinate process

Identifiers

PMID27174220
PMCPMC5007271
OpenAlexW2373744563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.