Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27173645›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2017

Expertise of German paramedics concerning the prehospital treatment of patients with spinal trauma.

M Kreinest, S Goller, B Gliwitzky, P A Grützner, M Küffer, D Häske, V Papathanassiou, M Münzberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Epidemiology and predictors of traumatic spine injury in severely injured patients: implications for emergency procedures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M KreinestDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
S GollerDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
B GliwitzkyPHTLS Europe Research Group, Offenbach/Queich, Germany.
P A GrütznerDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
M KüfferS2-Statistics Services, Berlin, Germany.
D HäskePHTLS Europe Research Group, Offenbach/Queich, Germany.
V PapathanassiouDeutsche Hochschule für Prävention und Gesundheitsmanagement, University of Applied Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany.
M MünzbergDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany. matthias.muenzberg@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEDeutsche Hochschule für Prävention und Gesundheitsmanagement · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpinal immobilization is a standard procedure in emergency medicine. Increasing awareness of complications associated with immobilization of trauma patients leads to controversial discussions in the literature. Current guidelines require to include considerations of accident mechanism, an assessment of the patient's condition and an examination of the spine in the decision-making process if immobilization of the spine should be performed. This requires sound knowledge of assessing these parameters. The aim of the current study is to analyze German paramedics' subjective uncertainty in terms of their prehospital assessment and treatment of patients suffering from spine injuries.

methodsOver a period of 17 months participants in a trauma course were asked to complete a standardized anonymous questionnaire about subjective uncertainty of prehospital assessment and management of spinal trauma before participation in that course. Questions about the frequency of application of different immobilization tools and skills training on spinal immobilization were also asked.

resultsA total of 465 paramedics were surveyed. The participants did not indicate any uncertainty about the prehospital diagnosis and treatment of spinal injuries. The feeling of confidence was significantly greater in participants who had already attended another course on structured trauma care before. The participants agreed with the statements that standardized algorithms facilitate teamwork and that there is a need for a protocol for the prehospital treatment of spinal injuries.

conclusionsParamedics do not feel uncertain about the prehospital assessment and treatment of spinal injuries. The feeling of confidence in participants who had already attended a course on the treatment of trauma patients before was significantly higher.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceAdultAPACHEBenchmarkingEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpinal InjuriesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCervical collarImmobilizationPrehospitalTrauma

Identifiers

PMID27173645
OpenAlexW2370124260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.