Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27173522›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

PepPSy: a web server to prioritize gene products in experimental and biocuration workflows.

Olivier Sallou, Paula D Duek, Thomas A Darde, Olivier Collin, Lydie Lane, Frédéric Chalmel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olivier SallouGenouest Bioinformatics Platform, IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes 35042, France.
Paula D DuekCALIPHO Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CMU, Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Thomas A DardeGenouest Bioinformatics Platform, IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes 35042, France IRSET, Inserm U1085, 9 avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, Rennes 35000, France.
Olivier CollinGenouest Bioinformatics Platform, IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes 35042, France.
Lydie LaneCALIPHO Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CMU, Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland Department of Human Protein Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU, Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Frédéric ChalmelIRSET, Inserm U1085, 9 avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, Rennes 35000, France frederic.chalmel@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the 20 000 human gene products predicted from genome annotation, about 3000 still lack validation at protein level. We developed PepPSy, a user-friendly gene expression-based prioritization system, to help investigators to determine in which human tissues they should look for an unseen protein. PepPSy can also be used by biocurators to revisit the annotation of specific categories of proteins based on the 'omics' data housed by the system. In this study, it was used to prioritize 21 dubious protein-coding genes among the 616 annotated in neXtProt for reannotation. PepPSy is freely available at http://peppsy.genouest.orgDatabase URL: http://peppsy.genouest.org.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticInternetUser-Computer InterfaceComputational BiologyDatabase Management SystemsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsWorkflowProteins

Identifiers

PMID27173522
PMCPMC4865363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.