Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27173405›Full record

ArticleParasitology2016

Anthelmintic effects of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) against gastrointestinal nematode parasites in experimentally infected cattle.

Miguel Peña-Espinoza, Stig M Thamsborg, Olivier Desrues, Tina V A Hansen, Heidi L Enemark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ethnoveterinary perspectives and promising future.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel Peña-EspinozaSection for Bacteriology, Pathology and Parasitology,National Veterinary Institute,Technical University of Denmark,Bülowsvej 27,1870 Frederiksberg C,Denmark.
Stig M ThamsborgSection for Parasitology and Aquatic Diseases,Department of Veterinary Disease Biology,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,University of Copenhagen,Dyrlægevej 100,1870 Frederiksberg C,Denmark.
Olivier DesruesSection for Parasitology and Aquatic Diseases,Department of Veterinary Disease Biology,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,University of Copenhagen,Dyrlægevej 100,1870 Frederiksberg C,Denmark.
Tina V A HansenSection for Parasitology and Aquatic Diseases,Department of Veterinary Disease Biology,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,University of Copenhagen,Dyrlægevej 100,1870 Frederiksberg C,Denmark.
Heidi L EnemarkSection for Bacteriology, Pathology and Parasitology,National Veterinary Institute,Technical University of Denmark,Bülowsvej 27,1870 Frederiksberg C,Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two experiments studied the effects of dietary chicory against gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle. In Experiment (Exp.) 1, stabled calves were fed chicory silage (CHI1; n = 9) or ryegrass/clover hay (CTL1; n = 6) with balanced protein/energy intakes between groups. After 16 days, all calves received 10 000 Ostertagia ostertagi and 66 000 Cooperia oncophora third-stage larvae (L3) [day (D) 0 post-infection (p.i.)]. In Exp. 2, calves were assigned to pure chicory (CHI2; n=10) or ryegrass/clover (CTL2; n = 10) pastures. After 7 days, animals received 20 000 O. ostertagi L3/calf (D0 p.i.) and were moved regularly preventing pasture-borne infections. Due to poor regrowth of the chicory pasture, CHI2 was supplemented with chicory silage. At D40 p.i. (Exp. 1) and D35 p.i. (Exp. 2) calves were slaughtered for worm recovery. In Exp.1, fecal egg counts (FEC) were similar between groups. However, O. ostertagi counts were significantly reduced in CHI1 by 60% (geometric mean; P < 0·01), whereas C. oncophora burdens were unaffected (P = 0·12). In Exp. 2, FEC were markedly lowered in CHI2 from D22 p.i onwards (P < 0·01). Ostertagia ostertagi adult burdens were significantly reduced in CHI2 by 66% (P < 0·001). Sesquiterpene lactones were identified only in chicory (fresh/silage). Chicory shows promise as an anti-Ostertagia feed for cattle and further studies should investigate its on-farm use.

Indexed as

Animal FeedCichorium intybusAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesFecesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticLoliumNematodaNematode InfectionsOstertagiaParasite Egg CountSesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesanthelmintic effectscattleCichorium intybusCooperia oncophoraOstertagia ostertagiruminantsesquiterpene lactonessilage

Identifiers

PMID27173405
PMCPMC4988272
OpenAlexW2367968217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.