Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27173401›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2016

Transfer Function Analysis of Dynamic Blood Flow Control in the Rat Kidney.

Ioannis Sgouralis, Vasileios Maroulas, Anita T Layton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioannis SgouralisNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. sgouralis@nimbios.org.
Vasileios MaroulasDepartment of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Anita T LaytonDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Modeling Solute Transport and Urine Concentrating Mechanism in the Rat KidneyR01DK089066 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LAYTON, ANITA · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal blood flow is regulated by the myogenic response (MR) and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). Both mechanisms function to buffer not only steady pressure perturbations but also transient ones. In this study, we develop two models of renal autoregulation-a comprehensive model and a simplified model-and use them to analyze the individual contributions of MR and TGF in buffering transient pressure perturbations. Both models represent a single nephron of a rat kidney together with the associated vasculature. The comprehensive model includes detailed representation of the vascular properties and cellular processes. In contrast, the simplified model represents a minimal set of key processes. To assess the degree to which fluctuations in renal perfusion pressure at different frequencies are attenuated, we derive a transfer function for each model. The transfer functions of both models predict resonance at 45 and 180 mHz, which are associated with TGF and MR, respectively, effective autoregulation below [Formula: see text]100 mHz, and amplification of pressure perturbations above [Formula: see text]200 mHz. The predictions are in good agreement with experimental findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsHemodynamicsHomeostasisMathematical ConceptsMembrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalMuscle, Smooth, VascularRatsRenal CirculationVascular ResistanceAutoregulationComplex systemDynamic controlHemodynamicsKidneySystem identificationTransfer function

Identifiers

PMID27173401
PMCPMC5902684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.