Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27172224›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Fluorescent Beads Are a Versatile Tool for Staging Caenorhabditis elegans in Different Life Histories.

Liberta Nika, Taylor Gibson, Rebecca Konkus, Xantha Karp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. microPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DistinctmicroPublication biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Epidermal Remodeling inGenetics · 2019
    Article
  19. Working with dauer larvae.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liberta NikaDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859.
Taylor GibsonDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859.
Rebecca KonkusDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859.
Xantha KarpDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859 karp1x@cmich.edu.
Central Michigan University · US

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Stem Cell Multipotency During QuiescenceR15GM117568 · NIGMS · CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI KARP, XANTHA · 2015 to 2015
$351k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM117568NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise staging of Caenorhabditis elegans is essential for developmental studies in different environmental conditions. In favorable conditions, larvae develop continuously through four larval stages separated by molting periods. Distinguishing molting from intermolt larvae has been achieved using transgenes with molting reporters, therefore requiring strain constructions, or careful observation of individuals for pharyngeal pumping or behavioral quiescence. In unfavorable conditions, larvae can enter the stress-resistant and developmentally arrested dauer larva stage. Identifying dauer larvae has been based on their ability to withstand detergent selection, precluding identification of recovering animals or of mutants with defects in dauer morphogenesis. Here, we describe a simple method to distinguish molting larvae or dauer larvae from intermolt larvae that bypasses the limitations of current methods. Fluorescent latex beads are mixed with the bacterial food source and ingested by intermolt larvae and adults. Molting and dauer larvae do not feed, and therefore lack beads in their digestive tract. The presence of beads can be determined using a dissecting microscope at magnifications as low as 100 ×, or by using a wormsorter for high-throughput experiments. We find that continuously developing bead-lacking larvae display hallmarks of molting, including expression of the mlt-10::gfp molting marker and a lack of pharyngeal pumping. Furthermore, wild-type and mutant dauer larvae produced by any of three common methods are accurately identified by a lack of beads. Importantly, this method is effective in SDS-sensitive mutant backgrounds and can identify recovering dauer larvae, a stage for which there is no other method of positive selection.

Indexed as

MicrospheresAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorescent DyesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLarvaMicroscopy, FluorescenceMoltingMorphogenesisFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsC. elegansdauerdevelopmental stagefluorescent beadsmolting

Identifiers

PMID27172224
PMCPMC4938646
OpenAlexW2414359201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.