Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27172201›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

A High-Resolution SNP Array-Based Linkage Map Anchors a New Domestic Cat Draft Genome Assembly and Provides Detailed Patterns of Recombination.

Gang Li, LaDeana W Hillier, Robert A Grahn, Aleksey V Zimin, Victor A David, Marilyn Menotti-Raymond, Rondo Middleton, Steven Hannah, Sher Hendrickson, Alex Makunin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic evidence for inbreeding depression and purging of deleterious genetic variation in Indian tigers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang LiDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.
LaDeana W HillierMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108.
Robert A GrahnCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri 65201 Population Health and Reproduction, University of California-Davis, California 95616.
Aleksey V ZiminInstitute for Physical Sciences and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Victor A DavidNational Cancer Institute-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Maryland 21702.
Marilyn Menotti-RaymondNational Cancer Institute-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Maryland 21702.
Rondo MiddletonNestlé Purina PetCare Company, St. Louis, Missouri 63134.
Steven HannahNestlé Purina PetCare Company, St. Louis, Missouri 63134.
Sher HendricksonDepartment of Biology, Shepherd University, Shepherdstown, West Virginia 25443 Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, Russia.
Alex MakuninTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, Russia.
Stephen J O'BrienNational Cancer Institute-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Maryland 21702 Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, Russia.
Pat MinxMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108.
Richard K WilsonMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108.
Leslie A LyonsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri 65201 Population Health and Reproduction, University of California-Davis, California 95616.
Wesley C WarrenMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108 wmurphy@cvm.tamu.edu wwarren@genome.wustl.edu.
William J MurphyDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 wmurphy@cvm.tamu.edu wwarren@genome.wustl.edu.
James S. McDonnell Foundation · USTexas A&M University · USMissouri College · USSt Petersburg University · RUNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USShepherd University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Computational Methods for Genome Assembly, Transcript Assembly, and Variant DiscoveryR01HG006677 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2011 to 2025
$10.7M
Reliable Assembler for Whole Genome Shotgun Data.R01HG002945 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI YORKE, JAMES A · 2003 to 2013
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002945NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution genetic and physical maps are invaluable tools for building accurate genome assemblies, and interpreting results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Previous genetic and physical maps anchored good quality draft assemblies of the domestic cat genome, enabling the discovery of numerous genes underlying hereditary disease and phenotypes of interest to the biomedical science and breeding communities. However, these maps lacked sufficient marker density to order thousands of shorter scaffolds in earlier assemblies, which instead relied heavily on comparative mapping with related species. A high-resolution map would aid in validating and ordering chromosome scaffolds from existing and new genome assemblies. Here, we describe a high-resolution genetic linkage map of the domestic cat genome based on genotyping 453 domestic cats from several multi-generational pedigrees on the Illumina 63K SNP array. The final maps include 58,055 SNP markers placed relative to 6637 markers with unique positions, distributed across all autosomes and the X chromosome. Our final sex-averaged maps span a total autosomal length of 4464 cM, the longest described linkage map for any mammal, confirming length estimates from a previous microsatellite-based map. The linkage map was used to order and orient the scaffolds from a substantially more contiguous domestic cat genome assembly (Felis catus v8.0), which incorporated ∼20 × coverage of Illumina fragment reads. The new genome assembly shows substantial improvements in contiguity, with a nearly fourfold increase in N50 scaffold size to 18 Mb. We use this map to report probable structural errors in previous maps and assemblies, and to describe features of the recombination landscape, including a massive (∼50 Mb) recombination desert (of virtually zero recombination) on the X chromosome that parallels a similar desert on the porcine X chromosome in both size and physical location.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic LinkageGenomeGenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, GeneticAnimalsCatsChromosomesComputational BiologyFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsTranslocation, Geneticdomestic catFelis catusgenetic mapIllumina 63K SNP arrayrecombination

Identifiers

PMID27172201
PMCPMC4889657
OpenAlexW2368350608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.