Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27172190›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Chromosome-Wide Impacts on the Expression of Incompatibilities in Hybrids of Tigriopus californicus.

Christopher S Willett, Thiago G Lima, Inna Kovaleva, Lydia Hatfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strong selective effects of mitochondrial DNA on the nuclear genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Hybridization, sex-specific genomic architecture and local adaptation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher S WillettDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280 willett4@email.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-9265
Thiago G LimaDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280.ORCID 0000-0003-3234-5225
Inna KovalevaDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280.
Lydia HatfieldDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome rearrangements such as inversions have been recognized previously as contributing to reproductive isolation by maintaining alleles together that jointly contribute to deleterious genetic interactions and postzygotic reproductive isolation. In this study, an impact of potential incompatibilities merely residing on the same chromosome was found in crosses of populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus When genetically divergent populations of this copepod are crossed, hybrids show reduced fitness, and deviations from expected genotypic ratios can be used to determine regions of the genome involved in deleterious interactions. In this study, a set of markers was genotyped for a cross of two populations of T. californicus, and these markers show widespread deviations from Mendelian expectations, with entire chromosomes showing marked skew. Despite the importance of mtDNA/nuclear interactions in incompatibilities in this system in previous studies, in these crosses the expected patterns stemming from these interactions are not widely apparent. Females lack recombination in this species, and a striking difference is observed between male and female backcrosses. This suggests that the maintenance of multiple loci on individual chromosomes can enable some incompatibilities, perhaps playing a similar role in the initial rounds of hybridization to chromosomal rearrangements in preserving sets of alleles together that contribute to incompatibilities. Finally, it was observed that candidate pairs of incompatibility regions are not consistently interacting across replicates or subsets of these crosses, despite the repeatability of the deviations at many of the single loci themselves, suggesting that more complicated models of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities may need to be considered.

Indexed as

ChromosomesGene ExpressionHybridization, GeneticAnimalsCopepodaCrosses, GeneticEpistasis, GeneticFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenotypeMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproductioncopepodDobzhansky-Muller incompatibilitiesMendelian ratio deviationspostzygotic reproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID27172190
PMCPMC4889669
OpenAlexW2347353939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.