Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27172189›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Fine-Scale Crossover Rate Variation on the Caenorhabditis elegans X Chromosome.

Max R Bernstein, Matthew V Rockman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. High-resolution global recombination mapping inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. WormQTL2: an interactive platform for systems genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max R BernsteinDepartment of Biology and Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, NY 10003.ORCID 0000-0001-6468-3953
Matthew V RockmanDepartment of Biology and Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, NY 10003 mrockman@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-8906

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Discovery and Characterization of Quantitative Trait NucleotidesR01GM089972 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ROCKMAN, MATTHEW · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089972NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination creates genotypic diversity within species. Recombination rates vary substantially across taxa, and the distribution of crossovers can differ significantly among populations and between sexes. Crossover locations within species have been found to vary by chromosome and by position within chromosomes, where most crossover events occur in small regions known as recombination hotspots. However, several species appear to lack hotspots despite significant crossover heterogeneity. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was previously found to have the least fine-scale variation in crossover distribution among organisms studied to date. It is unclear whether this pattern extends to the X chromosome given its unique compaction through the pachytene stage of meiotic prophase in hermaphrodites. We generated 798 recombinant nested near-isogenic lines (NILs) with crossovers in a 1.41 Mb region on the left arm of the X chromosome to determine if its recombination landscape is similar to that of the autosomes. We find that the fine-scale variation in crossover rate is lower than that of other model species, and is inconsistent with hotspots. The relationship of genomic features to crossover rate is dependent on scale, with GC content, histone modifications, and nucleosome occupancy being negatively associated with crossovers. We also find that the abundances of 4- to 6-bp DNA motifs significantly explain crossover density. These results are consistent with recombination occurring at unevenly distributed sites of open chromatin.

Indexed as

Crossing Over, GeneticGenetic VariationX ChromosomeAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCluster AnalysisGenomeGenomicsGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistonesINDEL MutationMeiosisMutationNucleotide MotifsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHistonesC. eleganscrossoversmeiosisrecombination rate variation

Identifiers

PMID27172189
PMCPMC4889672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.