Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27172187›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Sex Differences in Drosophila Somatic Gene Expression: Variation and Regulation by doublesex.

Michelle N Arbeitman, Felicia N New, Justin M Fear, Tiffany S Howard, Justin E Dalton, Rita M Graze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tissue-specific metabolomic signatures for aRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex-biased expression is associated with chromatin state inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Ageing desexualizes theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Investigation ofeLife · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Modular tissue-specific regulation ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle N ArbeitmanBiomedical Sciences Department and Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 michelle.arbeitman@med.fsu.edu rmgraze@auburn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-4352
Felicia N NewDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0266.
Justin M FearDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0266.
Tiffany S HowardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.
Justin E DaltonBiomedical Sciences Department and Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Rita M GrazeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Alabama 36849 michelle.arbeitman@med.fsu.edu rmgraze@auburn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9872-109X

Funding

Genes Underlying Reproductive Behavior and PhysiologyR01GM073039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARBEITMAN, MICHELLE N · 2006 to 2020
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in gene expression have been widely studied in Drosophila melanogaster Sex differences vary across strains, but many molecular studies focus on only a single strain, or on genes that show sexually dimorphic expression in many strains. How extensive variability is and whether this variability occurs among genes regulated by sex determination hierarchy terminal transcription factors is unknown. To address these questions, we examine differences in sexually dimorphic gene expression between two strains in Drosophila adult head tissues. We also examine gene expression in doublesex (dsx) mutant strains to determine which sex-differentially expressed genes are regulated by DSX, and the mode by which DSX regulates expression. We find substantial variation in sex-differential expression. The sets of genes with sexually dimorphic expression in each strain show little overlap. The prevalence of different DSX regulatory modes also varies between the two strains. Neither the patterns of DSX DNA occupancy, nor mode of DSX regulation explain why some genes show consistent sex-differential expression across strains. We find that the genes identified as regulated by DSX in this study are enriched with known sites of DSX DNA occupancy. Finally, we find that sex-differentially expressed genes and genes regulated by DSX are highly enriched on the fourth chromosome. These results provide insights into a more complete pool of potential DSX targets, as well as revealing the molecular flexibility of DSX regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalSex CharacteristicsSex Determination ProcessesTranscriptomeAnimalsChromosome MappingDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsDSX protein, Drosophilafru protein, Drosophilamsl-2 protein, DrosophilaNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSxl protein, Drosophilatra2 protein, DrosophilaTranscription FactorsTra protein, DrosophiladoublesexDrosophilagene expressionGenetics of SexRNA-seqsex biassex determinationsex hierarchytranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27172187
PMCPMC4938635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.