Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27172179›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Genomic Signatures of Experimental Adaptation to Antimicrobial Peptides in Staphylococcus aureus.

Paul R Johnston, Adam J Dobson, Jens Rolff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Selection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial Peptide Induced-Stress RendersFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul R JohnstonEvolutionary Biology, Institute for Biology, Free University of Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Berlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research, 14195, Germany paul.johnston@fu-berlin.de.
Adam J DobsonInstitute of Healthy Ageing, Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Jens RolffEvolutionary Biology, Institute for Biology, Free University of Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research, 14195, Germany.
Berlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of resistance against antimicrobial peptides has long been considered unlikely due to their mechanism of action, yet experimental selection with antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) results in rapid evolution of resistance in several species of bacteria. Although numerous studies have utilized mutant screens to identify loci that determine AMP susceptibility, there is a dearth of data concerning the genomic changes that accompany experimental evolution of AMP resistance. Using genome resequencing, we analyzed the mutations that arose during experimental evolution of resistance to the cationic AMPs iseganan, melittin, and pexiganan, as well as to a combination of melittin and pexiganan, or to the aminoglycoside antibiotic streptomycin. Analysis of 17 independently replicated Staphylococcus aureus selection lines, including unselected controls, showed that each AMP selected for mutations at distinct loci. We identify mutations in genes involved in the synthesis and maintenance of the cell envelope. These include genes previously identified from mutant screens for AMP resistance, and genes involved in the response to AMPs and cell-wall-active antibiotics. Furthermore, transposon insertion mutants were used to verify that a number of the identified genes are directly involved in determining AMP susceptibility. Strains selected for AMP resistance under controlled experimental evolution displayed consistent AMP-specific mutations in genes that determine AMP susceptibility. This suggests that different routes to evolve resistance are favored within a controlled genetic background.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsAdaptation, BiologicalAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic Peptidesantimicrobial peptide resistanceexperimental evolutionGenetics of ImmunityStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID27172179
PMCPMC4889650
OpenAlexW2417222975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.