Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27171605›Full record

Trial reportThe quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...2019

Copper-64 trastuzumab PET imaging: a reproducibility study.

Jorge A Carrasquillo, Patrick G Morris, John L Humm, Peter M Smith-Jones, Volkan Beylergil, Timothy Akhurst, Joseph A O'donoghue, Shutian Ruan, Shanu Modi, Clifford A Hudis and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of..., 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Radiation Dosimetry forJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Development and clinical evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. From bench to bedside:EJNMMI research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Theranostic Advances in Breast Cancer in Nuclear Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. PET and SPECT Imaging of the EGFR Family (RTK Class I) in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jorge A CarrasquilloMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA - carrasj1@mskcc.org.
Patrick G MorrisBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
John L HummDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter M Smith-JonesMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Volkan BeylergilMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy AkhurstMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph A O'donoghueDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shutian RuanMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shanu ModiBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Clifford A HudisBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Steven M LarsonMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBeaumont Hospital · IEPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUStony Brook University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
RESEARCH RESOURCE IN RADIONUCLIDE RESEARCHR24CA086307 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WELCH, MICHAEL J. · 1999 to 2009
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R24 CA086307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study aims to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, feasibility, and reproducibility of immunoPET imaging with copper-64 (64Cu) trastuzumab.

methodsAn IV injection of 296-370 MBq/5 mg 64Cu-trastuzumab was administered between 1 to 4 hours after routine trastuzumab treatment. Whole-body PET scans were performed immediately post-injection and at 24 hours post-injection. Serial pharmacokinetics were performed. Of 11 patients (median age of 52; range of 31-61), 8 underwent a repeat study with 64Cu-trastuzumab to assess image and pharmacokinetic reproducibility. Patients were monitored for toxicity.

resultsPatients experienced no allergic reactions or significant adverse effects from 64Cu-trastuzumab. Eight patients successfully completed a repeat 64Cu-trastuzumab study, with acceptable reproducibility of both the biodistribution and pharmacokinetic clearance. Study 1 versus study 2 showed similar serum concentration post-injection (mean 42.4±7.8 %ID/L vs. 44.7±12.6 %ID/L) and similar T1/2 (single exponential 46.1 vs. 44.2 hours), P>0.5. The volume of distribution (median 2.50 L) was in the range reported for trastuzumab and close to the estimated plasma volume of 2.60 L. Of 11 patients, two had 64Cu-trastuzumab localization corresponding to known tumor sites - one in liver and one in breast.

conclusionsPreliminary results suggest that scanning with 64Cu-trastuzumab is feasible, safe, and reproducible. Tumor uptake of 64Cu-trastuzumab was observed, but tumor detection exhibited low sensitivity in this study in which imaging was performed in the presence of trastuzumab therapy.

Indexed as

Copper RadioisotopesTrastuzumabAdultBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsTissue DistributionCopper-64Copper RadioisotopesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID27171605
PMCPMC9185799
OpenAlexW2412208628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.