Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27171535›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2016

NIOSH field studies team assessment: Worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor fabrication facility.

Sara A Brenner, Nicole M Neu-Baker, Adrienne C Eastlake, Catherine C Beaucham, Charles L Geraci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara A Brennera College of Nanoscale Science , State University of New York (SUNY) Polytechnic Institute , Albany , New York.
Nicole M Neu-Bakera College of Nanoscale Science , State University of New York (SUNY) Polytechnic Institute , Albany , New York.
Adrienne C Eastlakeb National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Catherine C Beauchamb National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Charles L Geracib National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Cincinnati , Ohio.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitous use of engineered nanomaterials-particulate materials measuring approximately 1-100 nanometers (nm) on their smallest axis, intentionally engineered to express novel properties-in semiconductor fabrication poses unique issues for protecting worker health and safety. Use of new substances or substances in a new form may present hazards that have yet to be characterized for their acute or chronic health effects. Uncharacterized or emerging occupational health hazards may exist when there is insufficient validated hazard data available to make a decision on potential hazard and risk to exposed workers under condition of use. To advance the knowledge of potential worker exposure to engineered nanomaterials, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Nanotechnology Field Studies Team conducted an on-site field evaluation in collaboration with on-site researchers at a semiconductor research and development facility on April 18-21, 2011. The Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (2.0) was used to perform a complete exposure assessment. A combination of filter-based sampling and direct-reading instruments was used to identify, characterize, and quantify the potential for worker inhalation exposure to airborne alumina and amorphous silica nanoparticles associated with th e chemical mechanical planarization wafer polishing process. Engineering controls and work practices were evaluated to characterize tasks that might contribute to potential exposures and to assess existing engineering controls. Metal oxide structures were identified in all sampling areas, as individual nanoparticles and agglomerates ranging in size from 60 nm to >1,000 nm, with varying structure morphology, from long and narrow to compact. Filter-based samples indicated very little aerosolized material in task areas or worker breathing zone. Direct-reading instrument data indicated increased particle counts relative to background in the wastewater treatment area; however, particle counts were very low overall, indicating a well-controlled working environment. Recommendations for employees handling or potentially exposed to engineered nanomaterials include hazard communication, standard operating procedures, conservative ventilation systems, and prevention through design in locations where engineered nanomaterials are used or stored, and routine air sampling for occupational exposure assessment and analysis.

Indexed as

SemiconductorsAir Pollutants, OccupationalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansInhalation ExposureMetal NanoparticlesNanotechnologyNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.Occupational ExposureParticle SizeUnited StatesWorkplaceAir Pollutants, OccupationalChemical mechanical planarizationengineered nanomaterialsNEAT 2.0occupational exposure assessmentsemiconductor fabricationuncharacterized occupational health hazard

Identifiers

PMID27171535
PMCPMC5016214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.