ArticlePloS one2016
Colorectal Cancer and the Human Gut Microbiome: Reproducibility with Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
185 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal Microbiome Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Compositional Changes and Microbial Biomarkers.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Gut Microbiota on the Clinical Course and Treatment Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review: The Relationship Between the Faecal Microbiome and Colorectal Neoplasia in Shotgun Metagenomic Studies.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Melody: meta-analysis of microbiome association studies for discovering generalizable microbial signatures.Genome biology · 2025Pooled it
- Is the oral pathogen, Porphyromona gingivalis, associated to colorectal cancer?: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Gut OncoMicrobiome Signatures (GOMS) as next-generation biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of fecal viromes demonstrates high diagnostic potential of the gut viral signatures for colorectal cancer and adenoma risk assessment.Journal of advanced research · 2023Pooled it
- Reproducible and opposing gut microbiome signatures distinguish autoimmune diseases and cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Microbiome · 2022Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Altered Gut Microbiota Reveals Microbial and Metabolic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Pooled it
- Host phenotype classification from human microbiome data is mainly driven by the presence of microbial taxa.PLoS computational biology · 2022Pooled it
- Detection of Fusobaterium nucleatum in feces and colorectal mucosa as a risk factor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The Human Microbiome in Relation to Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review: Gut microbiota in fecal samples and detection of colorectal neoplasms.Gut microbes · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The CRCbiome study: a large prospective cohort study examining the role of lifestyle and the gut microbiome in colorectal cancer screening participants.BMC cancer · 2021Trial
- Compositional and functional differences of the mucosal microbiota along the intestine of healthy individuals.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Cervicovaginal microbiome and natural history of HPV in a longitudinal study.PLoS pathogens · 2020Trial
- Gene Expression Analysis of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Colorectal Carcinoma.BioMed research international · 2020Trial
- Gut Microbial Topology and Metabolic Signatures Associated With Colorectal Neoplasia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and chronology of colibactin-associated mutational processes and their microbiome spectra in Japanese colorectal cancer.Nature genetics · 2026Article
125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut microbiota affects colorectal cancer development, but previous studies have varied in population, technical methods, and associations with cancer. Understanding these variations is needed for comparisons and for potential pooling across studies. Therefore, we performed whole-genome shotgun sequencing on fecal samples from 52 pre-treatment colorectal cancer cases and 52 matched controls from Washington, DC. We compared findings from a previously published 16S rRNA study to the metagenomics-derived taxonomy within the same population. In addition, metagenome-predicted genes, modules, and pathways in the Washington, DC cases and controls were compared to cases and controls recruited in France whose specimens were processed using the same platform. Associations between the presence of fecal Fusobacteria, Fusobacterium, and Porphyromonas with colorectal cancer detected by 16S rRNA were reproduced by metagenomics, whereas higher relative abundance of Clostridia in cancer cases based on 16S rRNA was merely borderline based on metagenomics. This demonstrated that within the same sample set, most, but not all taxonomic associations were seen with both methods. Considering significant cancer associations with the relative abundance of genes, modules, and pathways in a recently published French metagenomics dataset, statistically significant associations in the Washington, DC population were detected for four out of 10 genes, three out of nine modules, and seven out of 17 pathways. In total, colorectal cancer status in the Washington, DC study was associated with 39% of the metagenome-predicted genes, modules, and pathways identified in the French study. More within and between population comparisons are needed to identify sources of variation and disease associations that can be reproduced despite these variations. Future studies should have larger sample sizes or pool data across studies to have sufficient power to detect associations that are reproducible and significant after correction for multiple testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.