Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27171425›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Colorectal Cancer and the Human Gut Microbiome: Reproducibility with Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing.

Emily Vogtmann, Xing Hua, Georg Zeller, Shinichi Sunagawa, Anita Y Voigt, Rajna Hercog, James J Goedert, Jianxin Shi, Peer Bork, Rashmi Sinha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. The Human Microbiome in Relation to Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Gut Microbial Topology and Metabolic Signatures Associated With Colorectal Neoplasia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily VogtmannDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1355-5593
Xing HuaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Georg ZellerStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Shinichi SunagawaStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anita Y VoigtStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rajna HercogGenomics Core Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
James J GoedertDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jianxin ShiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Peer BorkStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rashmi SinhaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
National Cancer Institute · USEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

Lower Gastrointestinal Cancer StudiesZIACP010198 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SINHA, RASHMI · 2009 to 2025
$6.6M
European Research Council 268985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut microbiota affects colorectal cancer development, but previous studies have varied in population, technical methods, and associations with cancer. Understanding these variations is needed for comparisons and for potential pooling across studies. Therefore, we performed whole-genome shotgun sequencing on fecal samples from 52 pre-treatment colorectal cancer cases and 52 matched controls from Washington, DC. We compared findings from a previously published 16S rRNA study to the metagenomics-derived taxonomy within the same population. In addition, metagenome-predicted genes, modules, and pathways in the Washington, DC cases and controls were compared to cases and controls recruited in France whose specimens were processed using the same platform. Associations between the presence of fecal Fusobacteria, Fusobacterium, and Porphyromonas with colorectal cancer detected by 16S rRNA were reproduced by metagenomics, whereas higher relative abundance of Clostridia in cancer cases based on 16S rRNA was merely borderline based on metagenomics. This demonstrated that within the same sample set, most, but not all taxonomic associations were seen with both methods. Considering significant cancer associations with the relative abundance of genes, modules, and pathways in a recently published French metagenomics dataset, statistically significant associations in the Washington, DC population were detected for four out of 10 genes, three out of nine modules, and seven out of 17 pathways. In total, colorectal cancer status in the Washington, DC study was associated with 39% of the metagenome-predicted genes, modules, and pathways identified in the French study. More within and between population comparisons are needed to identify sources of variation and disease associations that can be reproduced despite these variations. Future studies should have larger sample sizes or pool data across studies to have sufficient power to detect associations that are reproducible and significant after correction for multiple testing.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNACase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome, HumanHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27171425
PMCPMC4865240
OpenAlexW2377027462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.