Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27171416›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

GapBlaster-A Graphical Gap Filler for Prokaryote Genomes.

Pablo H C G de Sá, Fábio Miranda, Adonney Veras, Diego Magalhães de Melo, Siomar Soares, Kenny Pinheiro, Luis Guimarães, Vasco Azevedo, Artur Silva, Rommel T J Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biotechnological Key Genes of theMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of a NovelMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Probiogenomics ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Draft Genome Sequences ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  14. Draft Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  15. Genomic analysis of four strains ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pablo H C G de SáInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Fábio MirandaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Adonney VerasInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Diego Magalhães de MeloInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Siomar SoaresInstitute of Biological and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Kenny PinheiroInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Luis GuimarãesInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Vasco AzevedoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Artur SilvaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Rommel T J RamosInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) technologies has resulted in an exponential increase in the number of complete genomes available in biological databases. This advance has allowed the development of several computational tools enabling analyses of large amounts of data in each of the various steps, from processing and quality filtering to gap filling and manual curation. The tools developed for gap closure are very useful as they result in more complete genomes, which will influence downstream analyses of genomic plasticity and comparative genomics. However, the gap filling step remains a challenge for genome assembly, often requiring manual intervention. Here, we present GapBlaster, a graphical application to evaluate and close gaps. GapBlaster was developed via Java programming language. The software uses contigs obtained in the assembly of the genome to perform an alignment against a draft of the genome/scaffold, using BLAST or Mummer to close gaps. Then, all identified alignments of contigs that extend through the gaps in the draft sequence are presented to the user for further evaluation via the GapBlaster graphical interface. GapBlaster presents significant results compared to other similar software and has the advantage of offering a graphical interface for manual curation of the gaps. GapBlaster program, the user guide and the test datasets are freely available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/gapblaster2015/. It requires Sun JDK 8 and Blast or Mummer.

Indexed as

GenomeSoftwareData CurationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingProkaryotic CellsReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID27171416
PMCPMC4865197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.