ArticlePloS one2016
Generating Gene Ontology-Disease Inferences to Explore Mechanisms of Human Disease at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Integrating AI-powered text mining from PubTator into the manual curation workflow at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Incorporating Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Data to Improve Chemical-Disease Inference of in Silico Toxicogenomics Methods.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Article
- CoMentG: comprehensive retrieval of generic relationships between biomedical concepts from the scientific literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- CTD tetramers: a new online tool that computationally links curated chemicals, genes, phenotypes, and diseases to inform molecular mechanisms for environmental health.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023Article
- Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2021.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Leveraging the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database to Fill in Knowledge Gaps for Environmental Health: A Test Case for Air Pollution-induced Cardiovascular Disease.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020Article
- Leveraging complementary computational models for prioritizing chemicals of developmental and reproductive toxicity concern: an example of food contact materials.Archives of toxicology · 2020Article
- Genetic Interactions Affect Lung Function in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: update 2019.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- A systems biology approach to predictive developmental neurotoxicity of a larvicide used in the prevention of Zika virus transmission.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2018Article
- Chemical-Induced Phenotypes at CTD Help Inform the Predisease State and Construct Adverse Outcome Pathways.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018Article
- Accessing an Expanded Exposure Science Module at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.Environmental health perspectives · 2018Article
- The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: update 2017.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- New approach to generating insights for aging research based on literature mining and knowledge integration.PloS one · 2017Article
- DisSim: an online system for exploring significant similar diseases and exhibiting potential therapeutic drugs.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Strategies for discovering common molecular events among disparate diseases hold promise for improving understanding of disease etiology and expanding treatment options. One technique is to leverage curated datasets found in the public domain. The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD; http://ctdbase.org/) manually curates chemical-gene, chemical-disease, and gene-disease interactions from the scientific literature. The use of official gene symbols in CTD interactions enables this information to be combined with the Gene Ontology (GO) file from NCBI Gene. By integrating these GO-gene annotations with CTD's gene-disease dataset, we produce 753,000 inferences between 15,700 GO terms and 4,200 diseases, providing opportunities to explore presumptive molecular underpinnings of diseases and identify biological similarities. Through a variety of applications, we demonstrate the utility of this novel resource. As a proof-of-concept, we first analyze known repositioned drugs (e.g., raloxifene and sildenafil) and see that their target diseases have a greater degree of similarity when comparing GO terms vs. genes. Next, a computational analysis predicts seemingly non-intuitive diseases (e.g., stomach ulcers and atherosclerosis) as being similar to bipolar disorder, and these are validated in the literature as reported co-diseases. Additionally, we leverage other CTD content to develop testable hypotheses about thalidomide-gene networks to treat seemingly disparate diseases. Finally, we illustrate how CTD tools can rank a series of drugs as potential candidates for repositioning against B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and predict cisplatin and the small molecule inhibitor JQ1 as lead compounds. The CTD dataset is freely available for users to navigate pathologies within the context of extensive biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components conferred by GO. This inference set should aid researchers, bioinformaticists, and pharmaceutical drug makers in finding commonalities in disease mechanisms, which in turn could help identify new therapeutics, new indications for existing pharmaceuticals, potential disease comorbidities, and alerts for side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.