Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27171239›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Molecular Relationship between Strains of M. bovis from Mexico and Those from Countries with Free Trade of Cattle with Mexico.

Feliciano Milian-Suazo, Leticia Garcia-Casanova, Suelee Robbe-Austerman, Germinal Jorge Canto-Alarcon, Isabel Barcenas-Reyes, Tod Stuber, Elba Rodriguez-Hernandez, Susana Flores-Villalva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary world · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole Genome Sequencing for Determining the Source ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feliciano Milian-SuazoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Leticia Garcia-CasanovaFacultad de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Suelee Robbe-AustermanNational Veterinary Services Laboratory-APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Germinal Jorge Canto-AlarconFacultad de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Isabel Barcenas-ReyesFacultad de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Tod StuberNational Veterinary Services Laboratory-APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Elba Rodriguez-HernandezCENID-Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal-INIFAP, Colón, Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Susana Flores-VillalvaCENID-Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal-INIFAP, Colón, Querétaro, Querétaro, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify relationships between spoligotypes of M. bovis from cattle in Mexico and those reported in countries with free trade of cattle with Mexico: Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America. Mexican spoligotypes were obtained from isolates collected from cattle in different parts of the country. Spoligotypes from Canada and New Zealand were obtained from different reports in the literature. Those from the United States were obtained from the database of the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in APHIS-USDA. In order to perform the analysis in a single data set, spoligotypes were all converted to binary data and classified according to www.mbovis.org or www.pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081. Epidemiologic information included country and species infected. From 3,198 isolates, 174 different spoligotypes were obtained, 95 were orphans. Ninety one percent of the isolates came from the Unites States (n = 1,609) and Mexico (n = 1,323). Spoligotype SB0265 is shared between Canada and the United States in cattle and wildlife. Six spoligotypes, SB0673, SB0121, SB0145, SB0971, SB0140 and SB1165, were frequent in cattle and wildlife in the United States and cattle in Mexico, suggesting wide exchange of strains. Spoligotype SB0669 was found only in Mexico. Spoligotype SB0140 was the most common in Australia and the sixth in the United States and Mexico. In a phylogenetic analysis, spoligotype SB0140 appears as the oldest spoligotype in the data set, suggesting this as the ancestral spoligotype for all spoligotypes in the five countries. Some spoligotypes are shared by animals and humans, corroborating the zoonotic importance of M. bovis.

Indexed as

CommerceInternationalityAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCattleMexicoMycobacterium bovis

Identifiers

PMID27171239
PMCPMC4865116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.