ArticlePloS one2016
Pre-Surgery Depression and Confidence to Manage Problems Predict Recovery Trajectories of Health and Wellbeing in the First Two Years following Colorectal Cancer: Results from the CREW Cohort Study.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04024917 (Implementation of a Cardiac Coherence Program to Reduce Anxiety in Patients With Peritoneal Carcinosis Treated by Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of a Cardiac Coherence Program to Reduce Anxiety in Patients With Peritoneal Carcinosis Treated by Surgery: Randomized Pilot Study
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of depression and its potential contributing factors in patients with enterostomy: A meta-analytical review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- A Theory-Based, Multidisciplinary Approach to Cocreate a Patient-Centric Digital Solution to Enhance Perioperative Health Outcomes Among Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Patient-Reported Unmet Needs and Preferred Strategies for Weight Management in Cancer Survivors.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Mapping of Preoperative Screening Tools Reveals Urgent Need for Standardization in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Prehabilitation for cancer surgery: perspectives of Australian patients, families, and health professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Postoperative Morbidity Is Not Associated with a Worse Mid-Term Quality of Life After Colorectal Surgery for Colorectal Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in Major Abdominal Surgery-Rationale, Modalities, Results and Limitations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Recovery trajectories after major abdominal surgery: A retrospective pooled cohort study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- The Impact of Surgery-Related Emotional Distress on Long-Term Outcome After Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting Postoperative Satisfaction with Breasts: How Important is the Preoperative BREAST-Q Score?Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Self-efficacy of PLHIV for self-management at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The association of pre-existing mental health conditions and patient outcomes after lower extremity orthopaedic trauma: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- The Impact of Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Low Stress-Coping Capacity on the Effects of Telephone Follow-Up on Recovery Measures After Hysterectomy.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Prehabilitation approaches for gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a narrative review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Change Trajectory of Symptom Distress, Coping Strategies, and Spiritual Wellbeing in Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Measuring the Wellbeing of Cancer Patients with Generic and Disease-Specific Instruments.Cancers · 2023Article
- Cognitive impairment in women newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer before treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper identifies predictors of recovery trajectories of quality of life (QoL), health status and personal wellbeing in the two years following colorectal cancer surgery.
methods872 adults receiving curative intent surgery during November 2010 to March 2012. Questionnaires at baseline, 3, 9, 15, 24 months post-surgery assessed QoL, health status, wellbeing, confidence to manage illness-related problems (self-efficacy), social support, co-morbidities, socio-demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics. Group-based trajectory analyses identified distinct trajectories and predictors for QoL, health status and wellbeing.
resultsFour recovery trajectories were identified for each outcome. Groups 1 and 2 fared consistently well (scores above/within normal range); 70.5% of participants for QoL, 33.3% health status, 77.6% wellbeing. Group 3 had some problems (24.2% QoL, 59.3% health, 18.2% wellbeing); Group 4 fared consistently poorly (5.3% QoL, 7.4% health, 4.2% wellbeing). Higher pre-surgery depression and lower self-efficacy were significantly associated with poorer trajectories for all three outcomes after adjusting for other important predictors including disease characteristics, stoma, anxiety and social support.
conclusionsPsychosocial factors including self-efficacy and depression before surgery predict recovery trajectories in QoL, health status and wellbeing following colorectal cancer treatment independent of treatment or disease characteristics. This has significant implications for colorectal cancer management as appropriate support may be improved by early intervention resulting in more positive recovery experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.