Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27171108›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2016

Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes.

Tuğba Nilay Kulaksız, Şükran Nazan Koşar, Suleyman Bulut, Yasemin Güzel, Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus Willems, Tahir Hazir, Hüseyin Hüsrev Turnagöl

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tuğba Nilay KulaksızDivision of Nutrition and Metabolism in Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey. nilaygungor17@gmail.com.
Şükran Nazan KoşarDivision of Nutrition and Metabolism in Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey. nazankosar@gmail.com.
Suleyman BulutDivision of Nutrition and Metabolism in Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey. slmbulut@gmail.com.
Yasemin GüzelDivision of Nutrition and Metabolism in Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey. ysmnonur@gmail.com.
Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus WillemsDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Chichester, College Lane, Chichester PO17 6PE, UK. m.willems@chi.ac.uk.
Tahir HazirDivision of Sport and Coaching, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey. thazir@hacettepe.edu.tr.
Hüseyin Hüsrev TurnagölDivision of Nutrition and Metabolism in Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey. husrevturnagol@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carbohydrate (CHO) concentration of a mouth rinsing solution might influence the CHO sensing receptors in the mouth, with consequent activation of brain regions involved in reward, motivation and regulation of motor activity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of maltodextrin mouth rinsing with different concentrations (3%, 6% and 12%) after an overnight fast on a 20 km cycling time trial performance. Nine recreationally active, healthy males (age: 24 ± 2 years; V ˙ O 2 m a x : 47 ± 5 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) participated in this study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study was conducted. Participants mouth-rinsed every 2.5 km for 5 s. Maltodextrin mouth rinse with concentrations of 3%, 6% or 12% did not change time to complete the time trial and power output compared to placebo (p > 0.05). Time trial completion times were 40.2 ± 4.0, 40.1 ± 3.9, 40.1 ± 4.4, and 39.3 ± 4.2 min and power output 205 ± 22, 206 ± 25, 210 ± 24, and 205 ± 23 W for placebo, 3%, 6%, and 12% maltodextrin conditions, respectively. Heart rate, lactate, glucose, and rating of perceived exertion did not differ between trials (p > 0.05). In conclusion, mouth rinsing with different maltodextrin concentrations after an overnight fast did not affect the physiological responses and performance during a 20 km cycling time trial in recreationally active males.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultBicyclingBlood GlucoseDouble-Blind MethodHeart RateHumansLactic AcidMaleMouthwashesPhysical EndurancePolysaccharidesRecreationYoung AdultBlood GlucoseLactic AcidmaltodextrinMouthwashesPolysaccharidescyclingendurance performancemaltodextrin solutionmouth rinse

Identifiers

PMID27171108
PMCPMC4882682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.