Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170937›Full record

ReviewSkin appendage disorders2015

Network Meta-Analysis of Onychomycosis Treatments.

Aditya K Gupta, Deanne Daigle, Kelly A Foley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin appendage disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical and device-based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pathogenesis, Immunology and Management of Dermatophytosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Challenges and Opportunities in the Management of Onychomycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya K GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada; Mediprobe Research Inc., London, Ont., Canada.
Deanne DaigleMediprobe Research Inc., London, Ont., Canada.
Kelly A FoleyMediprobe Research Inc., London, Ont., Canada.
Mediprobe Research (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany onychomycosis treatments have not been directly compared in head-to-head clinical trials.

objectiveTo determine the relative efficacy of onychomycosis treatments using network meta-analysis (NMA).

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and NMA of mycological cure rates.

resultsNineteen trials were included in the network. Terbinafine 250 mg was significantly superior to all treatments except itraconazole 400 mg pulse therapy. The itraconazole 400 mg pulse regimen was significantly superior to all topicals except efinaconazole 10% nail solution. Itraconazole 200 mg was significantly superior to all topical treatments, while fluconazole 150-450 mg, efinaconazole 10% nail solution, tavaborole 5% nail solution, ciclopirox nail lacquer 8%, terbinafine nail solution, and amorolfine 5% nail lacquer were significantly superior to placebo.

conclusionsNewly developed topicals have improved the odds ratios (ORs) of mycological cure, yet these ORs were not significantly greater than preexisting topical treatments. Further experience with these agents will reveal their clinical significance, and head-to-head trials are warranted. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Indexed as

AntifungalsNetwork meta-analysisOnychomycosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27170937
PMCPMC4857825
OpenAlexW1869367172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.