Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170830›Full record

ArticleD-Lib magazine : the magazine of the Digital Library Forum

MapAffil: A Bibliographic Tool for Mapping Author Affiliation Strings to Cities and Their Geocodes Worldwide.

Vetle I Torvik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in D-Lib magazine : the magazine of the Digital Library Forum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Does access to quality accreditation improve health? - Patient-level evidence from German cancer care.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building a PubMed knowledge graph.Scientific data · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Last Place? The Intersection of Ethnicity, Gender, and Race in Biomedical.AEA papers and proceedings. American Economic Association · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Geographical Distribution of Biomedical Research in the USA and China.WOSP 2017 : proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Mining Scientific Publications. International Workshop on Mining Scientific Publications (6th : 2017 : Toronto, Ont.) · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Kin of coauthorship in five decades of health science literature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vetle I TorvikUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, vtorvik@illinois.edu.

Funding

LIFE CYCLE EVENTS, PRODUCTIVITY, AND SCIENTIFIC IMPACTP01AG039347 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI WEINBERG, BRUCE A · 2013 to 2018
$5.4M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG039347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bibliographic records often contain author affiliations as free-form text strings. Ideally one would be able to automatically identify all affiliations referring to any particular country or city such as Saint Petersburg, Russia. That introduces several major linguistic challenges. For example, Saint Petersburg is ambiguous (it refers to multiple cities worldwide and can be part of a street address) and it has spelling variants (e.g., St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, and Leningrad, USSR). We have designed an algorithm that attempts to solve these types of problems. Key components of the algorithm include a set of 24,000 extracted city, state, and country names (and their variants plus geocodes) for candidate look-up, and a set of 1.1 million extracted word n-grams, each pointing to a unique country (or a US state) for disambiguation. When applied to a collection of 12.7 million affiliation strings listed in PubMed, ambiguity remained unresolved for only 0.1%. For the 4.2 million mappings to the USA, 97.7% were complete (included a city), 1.8% included a state but not a city, and 0.4% did not include a state. A random sample of 300 manually inspected cases yielded six incompletes, none incorrect, and one unresolved ambiguity. The remaining 293 (97.7%) cases were unambiguously mapped to the correct cities, better than all of the existing tools tested: GoPubMed got 279 (93.0%) and GeoMaker got 274 (91.3%) while MediaMeter CLIFF and Google Maps did worse. In summary, we find that incorrect assignments and unresolved ambiguities are rare (< 1%). The incompleteness rate is about 2%, mostly due to a lack of information, e.g. the affiliation simply says "University of Illinois" which can refer to one of five different campuses. A search interface called MapAffil has been developed at the University of Illinois in which the longitude and latitude of the geographical city-center is displayed when a city is identified. This not only helps improve geographic information retrieval but also enables global bibliometric studies of proximity, mobility, and other geo-linked data.

Indexed as

Author AffiliationsBibliographic DatabasesDigital LibrariesGeocodingGeographic IndexingGeoparsingMEDLINEPlace Name AmbiguityPubMedToponym ExtractionToponym Resolution

Identifiers

PMID27170830
PMCPMC4861081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.