Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170810›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

Current Practices in Global/International Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences: Preceptor and Student Considerations.

Emily K Dornblaser, Anna Ratka, Shaun E Gleason, David N Ombengi, Toyin Tofade, Patricia R Wigle, Antonia Zapantis, Melody Ryan, Sharon Connor, Lauren J Jonkman and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Introduction to Cultural Sensitivity and Global Pharmacy Engagement.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019
    Article
  7. Cultural Sensitivity and Global Pharmacy Engagement in Africa.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Purposeful Global Engagement in Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Global Health Education in Doctor of Pharmacy Programs in the United States.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emily K DornblaserUniversity of New England College of Pharmacy, Portland, Maine.
Anna RatkaChicago State University College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois.
Shaun E GleasonUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado.
David N OmbengiHampton University School of Pharmacy, Hampton, Virginia.
Toyin TofadeUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Patricia R WigleUniversity of Cincinnati James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Antonia ZapantisNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Melody RyanUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.
Sharon ConnorUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lauren J JonkmanUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Leslie OchsUniversity of New England College of Pharmacy, Portland, Maine.
Paul W JungnickelAuburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, Alabama.
Jeanine P AbronsUniversity of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa.
Naser Z AlsharifCreighton University Medical Center School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this article is to describe the key areas of consideration for global/international advanced pharmacy practice experience (G/I APPE) preceptors, students and learning objectives. At the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP), the GPE SIG prepared and presented an initial report on the G/IAPPE initiatives. Round table discussions were conducted at the 2014 AACP Annual Meeting to document GPE SIG member input on key areas in the report. Literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar and EMBASE with keywords was conducted to expand this report. In this paper, considerations related to preceptors and students and learning outcomes are described. Preceptors for G/I APPEs may vary based on the learning outcomes of the experience. Student learning outcomes for G/I APPEs may vary based on the type of experiential site. Recommendations and future directions for development of G/IAPPEs are presented. Development of a successful G/I APPE requires significant planning and consideration of appropriate qualifications for preceptors and students.

Indexed as

InternationalityClinical CompetenceCongresses as TopicEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyHumansPharmacy ResidenciesPreceptorshipSchools, PharmacyStudents, Pharmacyexperiential educationglobalinternationallearning objectivespreceptorsstudents

Identifiers

PMID27170810
PMCPMC4857634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.