Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170809›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

Current Practices in Global/International Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences: Home/Host Country or Site/Institution Considerations.

Naser Z Alsharif, Adnan Dakkuri, Jeanine P Abrons, Dennis Williams, David N Ombengi, HaiAn Zheng, Sara Al-Dahir, Toyin Tofade, Suzanna Gim, Mary Beth O'Connell and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Purposeful Global Engagement in Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Global Health Education in Doctor of Pharmacy Programs in the United States.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Naser Z AlsharifCreighton University Medical Center School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska.
Adnan DakkuriFerris State University College of Pharmacy, Big Rapids, Michigan.
Jeanine P AbronsUniversity of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa.
Dennis WilliamsUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
David N OmbengiHampton University School of Pharmacy, Hampton, Virginia.
HaiAn ZhengAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Albany, New York.
Sara Al-DahirXavier University of Louisiana College of Pharmacy, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Toyin TofadeUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Suzanna GimLong Island University Arnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy, Brooklyn, New York.
Mary Beth O'ConnellWayne State University Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Detroit, Michigan.
Anna RatkaChicago State University College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois.
Emily DornblaserUniversity of New England College of Pharmacy, Portland, Maine.

Funding

Xavier's RCMI Cancer Research ProgramG12MD007595 · NIMHD · XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI D'AMOUR, GENE, WANG, GUANGDI · 2012 to 2018
$15.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International outreach by schools and colleges of pharmacy is increasing. In this paper, we provide current practice guidelines to establish and maintain successful global/international advanced pharmacy practice experiences (G/I APPEs) with specific recommendations for home/host country and host site/institution. The paper is based on a literature review (2000-2014) in databases and Internet searches with specific keywords or terms. Educational documents such as syllabi and memoranda of understanding (MoUs) from pharmacy programs were also examined. In addition, a preliminary draft was developed and the findings and recommendations were reviewed in a 90-minute roundtable discussion at the 2014 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting. Recommendations for the host country include travel considerations (eg, passport, visa, air travel), safety, housing, transportation, travel alerts and warnings, health issues, and financial considerations. For the home country, considerations for establishment of G/I APPE site (eg, vetting process, MoU, site expectations) are described. The paper is a resource for development of new G/I APPEs and provides guidance for continuous quality improvement of partnerships focusing on G/I pharmacy education.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicInternationalityTravelEducation, PharmacyHumansPharmacy ResidenciesPreceptorshipProblem-Based LearningSchools, PharmacyStudents, PharmacyAPPEclerkshipsexperiential educationglobalhostInternationalpharmacyrotationssite

Identifiers

PMID27170809
PMCPMC4857633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.