Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170669›Full record

SynthesisClinical EEG and neuroscience2017

Mismatch Negativity in First-Episode Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis.

Sarah M Haigh, Brian A Coffman, Dean F Salisbury

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Schizophrenia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Neighborhood social fragmentation in relation to impaired mismatch negativity among youth at clinical high risk for psychosis and healthy comparisons.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Current neuropharmacology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah M HaighWestern Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA haighsm@upmc.edu.
Brian A CoffmanWestern Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dean F SalisburyWestern Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Mismatch Negativity and Complex Second-Order Sensory Memory in SchizophreniaR01MH094328 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SALISBURY, DEAN F · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatch negativity (MMN) to deviant stimuli is robustly smaller in individuals with chronic schizophrenia compared with healthy controls (Cohen's d > 1.0 or more), leading to the possibility of MMN being used as a biomarker for schizophrenia. However, there is some debate in the literature as to whether MMN is reliably reduced in first-episode schizophrenia patients. For the biomarker to be used as a predictive marker for schizophrenia, it should be reduced in the majority of cases known to have the disease, particularly at disease onset. We conducted a meta-analysis on the fourteen studies that measured MMN to pitch or duration deviants in healthy controls and patients within 12 months of their first episode of schizophrenia. The overall effect size showed no MMN reduction in first-episode patients to pitch-deviants (Cohen's d < 0.04), and a small-to-medium reduction to duration-deviants (Cohen's d = 0.47). Together, this indicates that pitch-deviant MMN is not a candidate biomarker for schizophrenia prediction, while duration-deviant MMN may hold some promise, albeit nearly a third as large an effect as in chronic schizophrenia. Potential causes for discrepancies between studies are discussed.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, AuditoryAcoustic StimulationBiomarkersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectroencephalographyHumansPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSchizophreniaSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersdurationeffect sizefirst-episodemismatch negativitypitchschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID27170669
PMCPMC5768309
OpenAlexW2384832252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.