Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170651›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2016

Does moving up a food chain increase aggregation in parasites?

R J G Lester, R McVinish

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Diversity of endohelminths parasitizing bred Muscovy ducksJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Measuring aggregation in parasite populations.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  12. Differential patterns of definitive host use by two fish acanthocephalans occurring in sympatry:International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J G LesterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
R McVinishSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia r.mcvinish@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5168-7012
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General laws in ecological parasitology are scarce. Here, we evaluate data on numbers of fish parasites published by over 200 authors to determine whether acquiring parasites via prey is associated with an increase in parasite aggregation. Parasite species were grouped taxonomically to produce 20 or more data points per group as far as possible. Most parasites that remained at one trophic level were less aggregated than those that had passed up a food chain. We use a stochastic model to show that high parasite aggregation in predators can be solely the result of the accumulation of parasites in their prey. The model is further developed to show that a change in the predators feeding behaviour with age may further increase parasite aggregation.

Indexed as

Food ChainModels, BiologicalParasitesAnimalsFishesAcanthocephalafishindependent increment processindex of dispersionMonogeneaTaylor's power law

Identifiers

PMID27170651
PMCPMC4892263
OpenAlexW2391655634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.