Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170433›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2016

Self-collected dried blood spots as a tool for measuring ovarian reserve in young female cancer survivors.

S C Roberts, S M Seav, T W McDade, S A Dominick, J R Gorman, B W Whitcomb, H I Su

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical evaluation of patterned dried plasma spot cards to support quantification of HIV viral load and reflexive genotyping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Beyond serosurveys: Human biology and the measurement of SARS-Cov-2 antibodies.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S C RobertsMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Science Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA.
S M SeavMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Science Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA.
T W McDadeDepartment of Anthropology and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 1810 Hinman Ave, Evanston, IL, USA.
S A DominickMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Science Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA.
J R GormanSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
B W WhitcombDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 408 Arnold House, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
H I SuMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Science Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA hisu@ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · USNorthwestern University · USOregon State University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

The Reproductive Window in Young Adult Cancer SurvivorsR01HD080952 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SU, HUI-CHUN IRENE · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
The Oncofertility Consortium: Fertility Preservation for WomanUL1RR024926 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOODRUFF, TERESA K · 2007 to 2007
$692k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024926NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionAre female young cancer survivors (YCS) able to self-collect high-quality dried blood spots (DBSs) at home to provide biospecimens for studying ovarian reserve? SUMMARY ANSWER: YCS can self-collect high-quality DBS specimens in non-clinical settings, and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels can be assayed in such specimens. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Large-scale biosample collection is a barrier to studying ovarian reserve in YCS. DBS collected by research personnel has high acceptability. AMH levels measured in DBS are highly correlated with those measured by serum-based methods. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In a prospective cohort study, YCS were recruited to self-collect DBS samples. AMH levels were assayed in 112 samples. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsYCS participants, ages 18-44, were recruited from a nationwide longitudinal cohort and DBS collection materials were posted to them. AMH levels were assayed by the Ansh DBS AMH ELISA and compared according to participant characteristics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among 163 potential participants, 123 (75%) were enrolled. Of those enrolled, 112 (91%) were able to complete DBS self-collection and submit mailed samples adequate for measuring AMH. Participants (mean age 31.6 [SD 5.5]) were 85% white, 87% college graduates and 46% reported higher income. Common cancer types were lymphoma and leukemia (34%), breast cancer (30%) and thyroid or skin cancer (8%). The geometric mean (95% confidence interval) AMH level in DBS samples was 0.24 ng/ml (0.16-0.36). In adjusted analysis, AMH levels for survivors of breast cancer (0.02 ng/ml [0.01-0.07]) or leukemia/lymphoma (0.03 ng/ml [0.01-0.08]) were lower than the levels in thyroid or skin cancer survivors (0.12 ng/ml [0.03-0.44]). Pelvic radiation remained associated with lower AMH levels (0.20 ng/ml [0.10-0.40] in unexposed versus 0.02 ng/ml [0.01-0.06] in exposed). Amenorrheic survivors had AMH levels (0.02 ng/ml [0.01-0.06]) that were lower than those of YCS with 7-9 (0.09 ng/ml [0.03-0.32]) or ≥10 (0.17 ng/ml [0.08-0.37]) menstrual periods in the past year. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results are generalizable to a population of highly educated, higher income YCS. It is unclear how generalizable the results are to other populations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsSelf-collected DBS is a patient-friendly and minimally invasive tool for studying ovarian reserve in geographically diverse populations. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Research related to the development of this paper was supported by the National Institutes of Health, grants UL1 RR024926 pilot and HD080952-02, and by the American Cancer Society MRSG-08-110-01-CCE. The authors report no competing interests.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsOvarian ReserveAdultAnti-Mullerian HormoneBlood Specimen CollectionFemaleHumansProspective StudiesAnti-Mullerian HormoneAMHcancer survivordried blood spotovarian reserveself-collection

Identifiers

PMID27170433
PMCPMC4901885
OpenAlexW2387131296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.