Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170286›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

BioC-compatible full-text passage detection for protein-protein interactions using extended dependency graph.

Yifan Peng, Cecilia Arighi, Cathy H Wu, K Vijay-Shanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Automatic gene annotation using GO terms from cellular component domain.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. BioCreative V BioC track overview: collaborative biocurator assistant task for BioGRID.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yifan PengComputer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware and yfpeng@udel.edu.
Cecilia ArighiComputer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware and Center for Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Cathy H WuComputer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware and Center for Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
K Vijay-ShankerComputer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware and.

Funding

Predictive Modeling & Optimal Control Framework for Model-Based Epidemic Response in DelawareP20GM103446 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI MELINDA K DUNCAN · 2012 to 2026
$67.2M
Biocreative Conference GrantR13GM109648 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ARIGHI, CECILIA NOEMI, COHEN, KEVIN B. · 2014 to 2016
$36k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103446NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103446NIGMS NIH HHS R13 GM109648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a large growth in the number of biomedical publications that report experimental results. Many of these results concern detection of protein-protein interactions (PPI). In BioCreative V, we participated in the BioC task and developed a PPI system to detect text passages with PPIs in the full-text articles. By adopting the BioC format, the output of the system can be seamlessly added to the biocuration pipeline with little effort required for the system integration. A distinctive feature of our PPI system is that it utilizes extended dependency graph, an intermediate level of representation that attempts to abstract away syntactic variations in text. As a result, we are able to use only a limited set of rules to extract PPI pairs in the sentences, and additional rules to detect additional passages for PPI pairs. For evaluation, we used the 95 articles that were provided for the BioC annotation task. We retrieved the unique PPIs from the BioGRID database for these articles and show that our system achieves a recall of 83.5%. In order to evaluate the detection of passages with PPIs, we further annotated Abstract and Results sections of 20 documents from the dataset and show that an f-value of 80.5% was obtained. To evaluate the generalizability of the system, we also conducted experiments on AIMed, a well-known PPI corpus. We achieved an f-value of 76.1% for sentence detection and an f-value of 64.7% for unique PPI detection.Database URL: http://proteininformationresource.org/iprolink/corpora.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsSemanticsSoftwareComputational BiologyData Mining

Identifiers

PMID27170286
PMCPMC4915133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.