Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170278›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2017

Can Doppler ultrasonography twinkling artifact be used as an alternative imaging modality to non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography in patients with ureteral stones? A prospective clinical study.

Volkan Sen, Cetin Imamoglu, Ibrahim Kucukturkmen, Tansu Degirmenci, Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt, Tarik Yonguc, Ozgu Aydogdu, Bulent Gunlusoy

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Volkan SenDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey. sen_volkan@yahoo.com.
Cetin ImamogluDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Ibrahim KucukturkmenDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey.
Tansu DegirmenciDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey.
Ibrahim Halil BozkurtDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey.
Tarik YongucDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozgu AydogduDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey.
Bulent GunlusoyDepartment of Urology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Saim Cikrikci Str. No: 59 Bozyaka, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the use of twinkling artifact (TA) on color Doppler ultrasonography (USG) as an alternative imaging modality to non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in patients with ureteral stones in this prospective study. Totally, 106 consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with ureterolithiasis by CT were enrolled in this prospective study. A urinary system color Doppler ultrasonography was performed on the same day with CT by an experienced radiologist who was blinded to the CT scan. TA was graded as 0, 1 and 2. The overall specificity of TA was calculated according to the NCCT as a gold standard method. The size, side and localization of stone and the demographic characteristics of patients were compared with twinkling positivity. TA on color Doppler USG was detected in 92 (86.8 %) patients. Statistically significant difference was found between the TA and localization of ureteral stones (p = 0.044). When we sub-grouped the patients according to the TA grades as 0, 1 and 2, 14 patients were with TA grade 0, 55 with TA grade 1 and 37 with TA grade 2. The mean stone size of groups was significantly different (p = 0.012). Bigger and proximal ureteral stones tended to have more TA on color Doppler USG. TA on color Doppler USG could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results between NCCT. It could be useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with ureterolithiasis.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorUreteral CalculiYoung AdultColor Doppler ultrasonographyComputed tomographyKidney–ureter–bladder radiographyTwinkling artifactUreterolithiasisUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.