Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27170131›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.

J Patrick Mayo, John H R Maunsell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reply to van Ede: Pulling on the threads of microsaccades and attention: What's left?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Microsaccades are directed toward the midpoint between targets in a variably cued attention task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Priority coding in the visual system.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Patrick MayoDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and mayo@neuro.duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-4667
John H R MaunsellDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.ORCID 0000-0003-0018-4439
Harvard University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Visual Processing in the Cerebral CortexR01EY005911 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MAUNSELL, JOHN H.R. · 1986 to 2025
$6.2M
Neuronal Dynamics of Visual Attention and Eye MovementsF32EY022529 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MAYO, JOSEPH PATRICK · 2012 to 2014
$156k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY022529NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledStudies of visual attention in monkeys typically measure neuronal activity when the stimulus event to be detected occurs at a cued location versus when it occurs at an uncued location. But this approach does not address how neuronal activity changes relative to conditions where attention is unconstrained by cueing. Human psychophysical studies have used neutral cueing conditions and found that neutrally cued behavioral performance is generally intermediate to that of cued and uncued conditions (Posner et al., 1978; Mangun and Hillyard, 1990; Montagna et al., 2009). To determine whether the neuronal correlates of visual attention during neutral cueing are similarly intermediate, we trained macaque monkeys to detect changes in stimulus orientation that were more likely to occur at one location (cued) than another (uncued), or were equally likely to occur at either stimulus location (neutral). Consistent with human studies, performance was best when the location was cued, intermediate when both locations were neutrally cued, and worst when the location was uncued. Neuronal modulations in visual area V4 were also graded as a function of cue validity and behavioral performance. By recording from both hemispheres simultaneously, we investigated the possibility of switching attention between stimulus locations during neutral cueing. The results failed to support a unitary "spotlight" of attention. Overall, our findings indicate that attention-related changes in V4 are graded to accommodate task demands. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Studies of the neuronal correlates of attention in monkeys typically use visual cues to manipulate where attention is focused ("cued" vs "uncued"). Human psychophysical studies often also include neutrally cued trials to study how attention naturally varies between points of interest. But the neuronal correlates of this neutral condition are unclear. We measured behavioral performance and neuronal activity in cued, uncued, and neutrally cued blocks of trials. Behavioral performance and neuronal responses during neutral cueing were intermediate to those of the cued and uncued conditions. We found no signatures of a single mechanism of attention that switches between stimulus locations. Thus, attention-related changes in neuronal activity are largely hemisphere-specific and graded according to task demands.

Indexed as

AttentionSpatial ProcessingVisual PerceptionAnimalsCuesMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsSpace PerceptionVisual Cortexmacaqueneuronal correlationspopulation codingspatial attentionvisionvisual area V4

Identifiers

PMID27170131
PMCPMC4863062
OpenAlexW2393615970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.