ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2016
The "Big C"-stigma, cancer, and workplace discrimination.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- In What Ways Does Health Related Stigma Affect Sustainable Employment and Well-Being at Work? A Systematic Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Non-Communicable Diseases-Related Stigma: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- From Mechanisms to Manifestations: A Scoping Review Exploring Cancer-Related Discrimination.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Social and Workplace Experiences of Individuals with a History of Cancer in Newfoundland and Labrador.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Comparing loss of contractual employment pre- and post-diagnosis in patients with rare versus common cancer types: a national registry-based study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Experiences of unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors who have pursued to return to paid employment: a focus group study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Returning to work is not enough for cancer survivors: vocational rehabilitation needs to consider work-related well-being.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- A Review of Acceptance Measures for Cancer Survivors: Employment, Multicultural, and Language Considerations.Journal of rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The growing and urgent need for interventions to mitigate cancer-related stigma in sub-Saharan Africa.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Multiple myeloma in people of working age in Czechia, Germany, and Poland: findings from a qualitative interview study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Mapping the colorectal cancer patient journey in Egypt: A qualitative study of diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle perspectives.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cancer Care Terminology in African Languages.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Stigma and related influencing factors in brain cancer patients: a cross-sectional study and parallel mediation analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- The role expectations of young women as wives after breast cancer treatment: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2024Article
- 'How Your Spirit Is Travelling'-Understanding First Nations Peoples' Experiences of Living Well with and after Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Small Empires: How Equipped are Small Business Owners to Hire People with Disabilities?Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Who Requests and Receives Workplace Accommodations? An Intersectional Analysis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Role performance and factors affecting quality of life in bladder cancer survivors with ileal orthotopic neobladder.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStigma and workplace discrimination have been identified as prominent challenges to employment following cancer. However, there has been limited examination of how stigma develops in work contexts and how it influences cancer survivors' return to work process and their disclosure decisions.
methodsIn the broader study from which this paper emerges, we used an exploratory qualitative design to examine the return to work process (including workplace supports and accommodations) of cancer survivors. We conducted 40 semi-structured interviews with (i) cancer survivors (n = 16), (ii) health care/vocational service providers (n = 16), and (iii) employer representatives (n = 8). We used thematic analysis methods to analyze the data. In this paper, we present data related specifically to workplace stigma, discrimination, and disclosure.
resultsContrasting perspectives were identified among our stakeholder groups regarding the existence and impact of stigma in the workplace. While most provider and employer representatives believed survivors were not likely to be stigmatized, cancer survivors themselves perceived cancer as a highly stigmatized illness in the workplace. Two inter-related elements were implicated in the development of workplace stigma following cancer: (1) ongoing misconceptions and fears associating cancer with death and (2) misperceptions regarding impacts on the workplace, including survivors' work abilities, productivity, reliability, the costs associated with their continued employment (e.g., workplace accommodations), and future impacts on the workplace related to cancer re-occurrence. Discriminatory behaviors, such as hiring discrimination, bullying, harassment, refusal of workplace accommodations, and limited career advancement opportunities, were also discussed. A supportive workplace, a desire to be open with co-workers, and a need to request supports and manage expectations were reasons provided for disclosure. Conversely, an unsupportive workplace, fear of discrimination, and a minimal need for assistance were reasons provided for not disclosing their cancer.
conclusionsStigma and workplace discrimination are significant concerns for cancer survivors. Anti-stigma programs should target ongoing myths regarding cancer and survivors' right to work, work abilities and productivity, and incorporate survivors' voices to enhance understanding. Survivors, health care providers, vocational service providers, and employers should become familiar with anti-discrimination legislation and recognize stigma and discriminatory behaviors when they occur. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors require guidance to decide whether (or not) to disclose their cancer, how to respond to discriminatory behaviors, and how to best state their needs for workplace accommodations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27170116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.