Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27169894›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2017

3D Printing of Tissue Engineered Constructs for In Vitro Modeling of Disease Progression and Drug Screening.

Joseph Vanderburgh, Julie A Sterling, Scott A Guelcher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  14. Three-DimensionalInternational journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Modeling development using hydrogels.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph VanderburghDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351604, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Julie A SterlingDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, 1235 MRB IV, 2222 Pierce Ave, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Scott A GuelcherDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351604, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. scott.guelcher@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

The Role of Mechanotransduction in Progression of Tumor-induced Bone DiseaseR01CA163499 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUELCHER, SCOTT A, RHOADES (STERLING), JULIE A · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Targeting the Bone Microenvironment to Reduce Tumor-induced Bone DiseaseI01BX001957 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI RHOADES (STERLING), JULIE A · 2013 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001957NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2D cell culture and preclinical animal models have traditionally been implemented for investigating the underlying cellular mechanisms of human disease progression. However, the increasing significance of 3D vs. 2D cell culture has initiated a new era in cell culture research in which 3D in vitro models are emerging as a bridge between traditional 2D cell culture and in vivo animal models. Additive manufacturing (AM, also known as 3D printing), defined as the layer-by-layer fabrication of parts directed by digital information from a 3D computer-aided design file, offers the advantages of simultaneous rapid prototyping and biofunctionalization as well as the precise placement of cells and extracellular matrix with high resolution. In this review, we highlight recent advances in 3D printing of tissue engineered constructs that recapitulate the physical and cellular properties of the tissue microenvironment for investigating mechanisms of disease progression and for screening drugs.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPrinting, Three-DimensionalAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansTissue Engineering3D printingAdditive ManufacturingBioprintingDrug screeningTissue engineered constructs

Identifiers

PMID27169894
PMCPMC5106334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.