ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2016
[What can and cannot be achieved by registries : Perspective of the registry working group of the German Network of Health Services Research].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, implementation and analysis of a quality assurance process for Informed Consents using the DZHK registry TORCH-DZHK1 as an example.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Representativeness of a German AI-enabled data network for secondary epidemiological analysis based on electronic health records.PloS one · 2026Article
- [The role of disease-specific registries in the field of rare diseases: opportunities, benefits and pitfalls].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [The shoulder and elbow register of the DVSE-trend monitoring or early warning system? : A literature-based analysis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [The Hamburg register for intravitreal injection therapies (QIVOM)].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022Article
- [AKTIN - The German Emergency Department Data Registry - real-time data from emergency medicine : Implementation and first results from 15 emergency departments with focus on Federal Joint Committee's guidelines on acuity assessment].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Article
- [Status and perspectives of registry-based studies in German ophthalmology].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Article
- [Data content of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Results of a random sample control].Der Unfallchirurg · 2018Review
- ["Everyone talks about quality …"].Der Unfallchirurg · 2018Article
- [Registry-based research in ophthalmology].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018Review
- Adverse events are rare after single-dose montelukast exposures in children.Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2018Article
- [Results from the German shoulder- and elbow arthroplasty register (SEPR) : Anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty in B2-glenoids?]Der Orthopade · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to clinical trials, registries and cohort studies are the fundamental basis of patient-orientated research. The importance of registries is increasing because more questions involving patient care under routine conditions (real world data) need to be answered. This article supplies answers to the questions: what can be achieved with registries and what are the limitations? Starting with a consensus definition of a registry from the German Network of Health Services Research (DNVF), the question of existing registries was examined and it was concluded that there was a lack of transparency. Consequently, a registry of registries similar to clinical trials registries is urgently needed as well as an evaluation of the quality of existing registries. Criteria are deduced that allow an assessment of the quality of a registry and which comprehensive possibilities registries can provide are discussed in eight different areas of interest to clinicians. The limitations of registries compared to randomized clinical trials and cohort studies are emphasized and discussed in this article. In the future, the use of registry-based randomized clinical trials (RRCT) will allow data related to efficacy as well as to effectiveness to be collated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27169850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.