Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27169702›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

How does pain experience relate to the need for pain relief? A secondary exploratory analysis in a large sample of cancer patients.

Anna Thit Johnsen, Morten A Petersen, Claire F Snyder, Lise Pedersen, Mogens Groenvold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A scoping review of breakthrough cancer pain: mapping the evidence landscape.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Relationship between prescribed opioids, pain management satisfaction, and pain intensity in oncology outpatients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Nausea in advanced cancer: relationships between intensity, burden, and the need for help.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Thit JohnsenThe Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital 20D, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark. anna.thit.johnsen@regionh.dk.
Morten A PetersenThe Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital 20D, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Claire F SnyderDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lise PedersenThe Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital 20D, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Mogens GroenvoldThe Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital 20D, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore (1) the information obtained from related but conceptually different approaches to pain assessment and (2) the extent to which the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) can be used as a screening tool to predict patient-reported need for pain relief.

methodsCancer patients randomly sampled from 56 hospital departments were included. Questionnaire items assessed patients' (a) pain experience using the EORTC QLQ-C30 pain scale and its two pain items separately (pain intensity and pain interference) and (b) pain burden and (c) need for pain relief using the Three-Levels-of-Needs Questionnaire (3LNQ).

resultsOf the 2364 patients contacted by mail, 1447 (61 %) completed the questionnaires. Among these, 51 % reported at least "a little" pain on the pain intensity item. The number of patients reporting pain to be a burden was similar, and pain experience and pain burden were highly correlated (correlation coefficients ranged from 0.85 to 0.91). Pain experience and pain burden were moderately correlated with the need for pain relief. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the EORTC QLQ-C30 discriminated between patients with and without a need for pain relief to an acceptable degree (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73-0.77). The cut-point a little gave a sensitivity of 84 % and specificity of 59 % for the item "Have you had pain?" and a sensitivity of 72 % and a specificity of 72 % for the pain scale.

conclusionsThe majority of patients who experienced pain felt it to be a problem. Pain experience and pain burden were substantially related to need for pain relief, and the latter could be predicted from the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPainPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerNeed assessmentPainPatient-reported outcomeQuestionnaireScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.