Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27169558›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2016

A qualitative exploration of the collaborative working between palliative care and geriatric medicine: Barriers and facilitators from a European perspective.

Gwenda Albers, K Froggatt, L Van den Block, G Gambassi, P Vanden Berghe, S Pautex, N Van Den Noortgate, EURO-IMPACT

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. "Journal of palliative medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Overlap Between Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care: A Scoping Literature Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Gwenda AlbersFederation Palliative Care of Flanders (FPCF), Vilvoorde, Belgium. gwenda.albers@gmail.com.
K FroggattInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
L Van den BlockEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
G GambassiIstituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
P Vanden BergheDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
S PautexDivision of Primary Care, University Hospitals Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
N Van Den NoortgateFederation Palliative Care of Flanders (FPCF), Vilvoorde, Belgium.
EURO-IMPACT
European Association for Palliative Care · BEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Geneva · CHGhent University Hospital · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an increasing number of people dying in old age, collaboration between palliative care and geriatric medicine is increasingly being advocated in order to promote better health and health care for the increasing number of older people. The aim of this study is to identify barriers and facilitators and good practice examples of collaboration and integration between palliative care and geriatric medicine from a European perspective.

methodsFour semi-structured group interviews were undertaken with 32 participants from 18 countries worldwide. Participants were both clinicians (geriatricians, GPs, palliative care specialists) and academic researchers. The interviews were transcribed and independent analyses performed by two researchers who then reached consensus.

resultsLimited knowledge and understanding of what the other discipline offers, a lack of common practice and a lack of communication between disciplines and settings were considered as barriers for collaboration between palliative care and geriatric medicine. Multidisciplinary team working, integration, strong leadership and recognition of both disciplines as specialties were considered as facilitators of collaborative working. Whilst there are instances of close clinical working between disciplines, examples of strategic collaboration in education and policy were more limited.

conclusionsImproving knowledge about its principles and acquainting basic palliative care skills appears mandatory for geriatricians and other health care professionals. In addition, establishing more academic chairs is seen as a priority in order to develop more education and development at the intersection of palliative care and geriatric medicine.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedInterdisciplinary CommunicationPalliative CareAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorEuropeFemaleGeriatricsHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27169558
PMCPMC4866297
OpenAlexW2358347849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.