ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016
Dependence of auditory spatial updating on vestibular, proprioceptive, and efference copy signals.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auditory contributions to postural and locomotor control: from basic research to clinical applications.Experimental brain research · 2026Review
- The effect of auditory cues on heading direction during stepping-in-place in healthy adults with experimentally induced vestibular asymmetry.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- The influence of postural load and early aging on dynamic sound localization: Evidence for reduced cognitive-motor reserve.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Studying dynamic sound source localization in a virtual maze with EEG and psychophysics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Internal models in active self-motion estimation: role of inertial sensory cues.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- A model of audio-visual motion integration during active self-movement.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Active listening modulates the spatial hearing experience: a multicentric study.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Multisensory decisions from self to world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Superior semicircular canal dehiscence and subsequent closure induces reversible impaired decision-making.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Benefits of active listening during 3D sound localization.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Naturalistic neuroscience and virtual reality.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Frequency-dependent integration of auditory and vestibular cues for self-motion perception.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Multisensory activation of ventral cochlear nucleus D-stellate cells modulates dorsal cochlear nucleus principal cell spatial coding.The Journal of physiology · 2018Article
- Auditory motion parallax.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans localize sounds by comparing inputs across the two ears, resulting in a head-centered representation of sound-source position. When the head moves, information about head movement must be combined with the head-centered estimate to correctly update the world-centered sound-source position. Spatial updating has been extensively studied in the visual system, but less is known about how head movement signals interact with binaural information during auditory spatial updating. In the current experiments, listeners compared the world-centered azimuthal position of two sound sources presented before and after a head rotation that depended on condition. In the active condition, subjects rotated their head by ∼35° to the left or right, following a pretrained trajectory. In the passive condition, subjects were rotated along the same trajectory in a rotating chair. In the cancellation condition, subjects rotated their head as in the active condition, but the chair was counter-rotated on the basis of head-tracking data such that the head effectively remained fixed in space while the body rotated beneath it. Subjects updated most accurately in the passive condition but erred in the active and cancellation conditions. Performance is interpreted as reflecting the accuracy of perceived head rotation across conditions, which is modeled as a linear combination of proprioceptive/efference copy signals and vestibular signals. Resulting weights suggest that auditory updating is dominated by vestibular signals but with significant contributions from proprioception/efference copy. Overall, results shed light on the interplay of sensory and motor signals that determine the accuracy of auditory spatial updating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.