Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168937›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2015

Gene expression during the first 28 days of axolotl limb regeneration I: Experimental design and global analysis of gene expression.

S Randal Voss, Alex Palumbo, Radha Nagarajan, David M Gardiner, Ken Muneoka, Arnold J Stromberg, Antony T Athippozhy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemical genetics of regeneration: Contrasting temporal effects of CoClDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  9. Large-scale variation in single nucleotide polymorphism density within the laboratory axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum).Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  10. Towards comparative analyses of salamander limb regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deep evolutionary origin of limb and fin regeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Randal VossDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA; Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Alex PalumboDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Radha NagarajanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
David M GardinerDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, UC-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
Ken MuneokaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USA.
Arnold J StrombergDepartment of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Antony T AthippozhyDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA; Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.

Funding

Research Resources for Model AmphibiansR24OD010435 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, JERAMIAH JAMES, VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2012 to 2025
$5.7M
GENOME RESOURCES FOR MODEL AMPHIBIANSR24RR016344 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016344NIH HHS R24 OD010435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is appreciated that global gene expression analyses can provide novel insights about complex biological processes, experiments are generally insufficiently powered to achieve this goal. Here we report the results of a robust microarray experiment of axolotl forelimb regeneration. At each of 20 post-amputation time points, we estimated gene expression for 10 replicate RNA samples that were isolated from 1 mm of heterogeneous tissue collected from the distal limb tip. We show that the limb transcription program diverges progressively with time from the non-injured state, and divergence among time adjacent samples is mostly gradual. However, punctuated episodes of transcription were identified for five intervals of time, with four of these coinciding with well-described stages of limb regeneration-amputation, early bud, late bud, and pallet. The results suggest that regeneration is highly temporally structured and regulated by mechanisms that function within narrow windows of time to coordinate transcription within and across cell types of the regenerating limb. Our results provide an integrative framework for hypothesis generation using this complex and highly informative data set.

Indexed as

Axolotllimbmicroarrayregenerationtranscription

Identifiers

PMID27168937
PMCPMC4860271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.