Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168923›Full record

ArticleOman medical journal2016

Adverse Reactions in Allogeneic Blood Donors: A Tertiary Care Experience from a Developing Country.

Sadia Sultan, Mohammad Amjad Baig, Syed Mohammed Irfan, Syed Ijlal Ahmed, Syeda Faiza Hasan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sociodemographic Factors Related to Adverse Donor Reactions in Shenzhen.International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadia SultanDepartment of Hematology and Blood Bank, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohammad Amjad BaigDepartment of Hematology and Blood Bank, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Mohammed IrfanDepartment of Hematology and Blood Bank, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Ijlal AhmedLiaquat National Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syeda Faiza HasanLiaquat National Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Liaquat National Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFragmented blood transfusion services along with an unmotivated blood donation culture often leads to blood shortage. Donor retention is crucial to meet the increasing blood demand, and adverse donor reactions have a negative impact on donor return. The aim of this study was to estimate adverse donor reactions and identify any demographic association.  .

methodsWe conducted a prospective study between January 2011 and December 2013. A total of 41,759 healthy donors were enrolled. Professionally trained donor attendants drew blood and all donors were observed during and following donation for possible adverse events for 20 minutes. Blood donors were asked to report if they suffered from any delayed adverse consequences.  .

resultsOut of 41,759 blood donors, 537 (1.3%) experienced adverse reactions. The incidence was one in every 78 donations. The mean age of donors who experienced adverse events was 26.0±6.8 years, and all were male. Out of 537 donors, 429 (80%) developed vasovagal reaction (VVR), 133 (25%) had nausea, 63 (12%) fainted, 35 (6%) developed hyperventilation, 9 (2%) had delayed syncope, and 9 (2%) developed hematoma. Arterial prick, nerve injury, cardiac arrest, and seizures were not observed. Donors aged less than < 30 years and weighing < 70 kg were significantly associated with VVR, hyperventilation, and nausea (p < 0.005). Undergraduates and Urdu speaking donors also had a significant association with fainting and nausea, respectively (p < 0.05).  .

conclusionThe prevalence of adverse events was low at our tertiary center. A VVR was the predominant adverse reaction and was associated with age and weight. Our study highlights the importance of these parameters in the donation process. A well-trained and experienced phlebotomist and pre-evaluation counseling of blood donors could further minimize the adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Adverse EffectsBlood DonorsSyncope, VasovagalVasovagal Reaction

Identifiers

PMID27168923
PMCPMC4861393
OpenAlexW2414404079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.