Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168668›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Linkage to Care in North Carolina and South Carolina Jails, 2012-2014.

Ben T Schoenbachler, Bryce D Smith, Arlene C Seña, Alison Hilton, Sallie Bachman, Mulamba Lunda, Anne C Spaulding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hepatitis C Screening: Barriers to Linkage to Care.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2019
    Article
  12. Reply.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Burden of Untreated HCV Infection in Hospitalized Inmates: a Hospital Utilization and Cost Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ben T SchoenbachlerOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN.
Bryce D SmithCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA.
Arlene C SeñaDurham County Department of Public Health, Durham, NC; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Infectious Diseases, Chapel Hill, NC.
Alison HiltonDurham County Department of Public Health, Durham, NC.
Sallie BachmanHopeHealth Inc., Orangeburg, SC.
Mulamba LundaHopeHealth Inc., Florence, SC.
Anne C SpauldingEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA; Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated a hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and linkage-to-care post-release program among detainees of small- to medium-sized jails in North Carolina and South Carolina as part of the Hepatitis Testing and Linkage to Care initiative.

methodsAn HCV testing and linkage-to-care program was implemented in selected jails in North Carolina and South Carolina from December 2012 to March 2014. Health-care workers not affiliated with the jails conducted HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) testing and linkage-to-care activities. The North Carolina jail provided universal opt-out testing for HCV; South Carolina jails initially targeted high-risk individuals before expanding to routine testing.

resultsOf 669 detainees tested for HCV in North Carolina, 88 (13.2%) tested anti-HCV positive, of whom 81 (92.0%) received an HCV RNA test, 66 (81.5%) of whom tested HCV RNA positive (i.e., currently infected). Of the 66 detainees with current HCV infection, 18 were referred to HCV medical care post-release and 10 attended their first appointment. Of 224 detainees tested for HCV in South Carolina, 18 (8.0%) tested anti-HCV positive, of whom 13 received an HCV RNA test. Nine of 13 detainees tested HCV RNA positive, seven detainees were referred to post-release medical care, and two detainees attended their first appointment. Overall, 106 of 893 (11.9%) detainees were anti-HCV positive.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that HCV testing, identification of infection, and linkage to care are feasible among jail populations. The rate of anti-HCV positivity was lower than that found in national studies of incarcerated populations, suggesting that HCV infection prevalence in jails may vary across U.S. states or regions.

Indexed as

PrisonsAdultDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansMaleNorth CarolinaOrganizational Case StudiesRNA, ViralSouth CarolinaYoung AdultRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID27168668
PMCPMC4853335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.