ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Derivative-Free Optimization of Rate Parameters of Capsid Assembly Models from Bulk in Vitro Data.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A method for efficient Bayesian optimization of self-assembly systems from scattering data.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assembly of virus capsids proceeds by a complicated cascade of association and dissociation steps, the great majority of which cannot be directly experimentally observed. This has made capsid assembly a rich field for computational models, but there are substantial obstacles to model inference for such systems. Here, we describe progress on fitting kinetic rate constants defining capsid assembly models to experimental data, a difficult data-fitting problem because of the high computational cost of simulating assembly trajectories, the stochastic noise inherent to the models, and the limited and noisy data available for fitting. We evaluate the merits of data-fitting methods based on derivative-free optimization (DFO) relative to gradient-based methods used in prior work. We further explore the advantages of alternative data sources through simulation of a model of time-resolved mass spectrometry data, a technology for monitoring bulk capsid assembly that can be expected to provide much richer data than previously used static light scattering approaches. The results show that advances in both the data and the algorithms can improve model inference. More informative data sources lead to high-quality fits for all methods, but DFO methods show substantial advantages on less informative data sources that better represent current experimental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.