Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168455›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2016

Fermented Milk Consumption and Common Infections in Children Attending Day-Care Centers: A Randomized Trial.

Andrey Prodeus, Violeta Niborski, Juergen Schrezenmeir, Alexander Gorelov, Anna Shcherbina, Alexander Rumyantsev

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Probiotics for preventing acute otitis media in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrey Prodeus*Children's Clinical Hospital No. 9 named after G.N. Speransky of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia †Danone Nutricia Research, Centre de Recherche Daniel Carasso, Palaiseau, France ‡University Medicine, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany §Federal Budget Institution of Science "Central Research Institute of Epidemiology" of The Federal Service on Customers' Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance ||Federal Government Budget Institution "Federal Scientific Clinical Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology named after Dmitry Rogachev" of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Violeta Niborski
Juergen Schrezenmeir
Alexander Gorelov
Anna Shcherbina
Alexander Rumyantsev
Danone (France) · FRCentral Research Institute of Epidemiology · RUDmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology · RUJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DERussian Children's Clinical Hospital · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigated the effect of a fermented milk product containing the Lactobacillus casei National Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (CNCM) I-1518 strain on respiratory and gastrointestinal common infectious diseases (CIDs) in children attending day-care centers in Russia.

methodsChildren ages 3 to 6 years received 100 g of a fermented milk product (n = 300) or a control product (n = 299) twice daily for 3 months, followed by a 1-month observation period. The primary outcome was the incidence of CIDs during the product consumption period.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the incidence of CIDs between the groups (N = 98 with fermented milk product vs N = 93 with control product). The overall number of CIDs (and no severe cases at all) in both study groups and in all 12 centers, however, was unexpectedly low resulting in underpowering of the study. No differences were found between the groups in the duration or severity of disease, duration of sick leave from day-care centers, parental missed working days, or in quality-of-life dimensions on the PedsQL questionnaire (P > 0.05).There was, however, a significantly lower incidence of the most frequently observed CID, rhinopharyngitis, in children consuming the fermented milk product compared with those consuming the control product (N = 81 vs N = 100, relative risk 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.96, P = 0.017) when considering the entire study period.

conclusionsAlthough no other significant differences were shown between the fermented milk and control product groups in this study, lower incidence of rhinopharyngitis may indicate a beneficial effect of this fermented milk product.

Indexed as

Cultured Milk ProductsLacticaseibacillus caseiAnimalsChildChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolCommunicable DiseasesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFermentationHumansIncidenceMaleMilkProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID27168455
PMCPMC5084641
OpenAlexW2392417585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.