Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168347›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2017

Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insights from animal models.

Henry Szechtman, Susanne E Ahmari, Richard J Beninger, David Eilam, Brian H Harvey, Henriette Edemann-Callesen, Christine Winter

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies and New Targets in OCD.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Henry SzechtmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: szechtma@mcmaster.ca.
Susanne E AhmariDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: ahmarise@upmc.edu.
Richard J BeningerDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. Electronic address: beninger@queensu.ca.
David EilamDepartment of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel. Electronic address: eilam@post.tau.ac.il.
Brian H HarveyMRC Unit on Anxiety and Stress Disorders, Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Electronic address: Brian.Harvey@nwu.ac.za.
Henriette Edemann-CallesenBereich Experimentelle Psychiatrie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: henriette-edemann.callesen@charite.de.
Christine WinterBereich Experimentelle Psychiatrie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: Christine.Winter@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DEMcMaster University · CANorth-West University · ZAQueen's University · CATel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Testing the Role of Circuit Plasticity in the Pathology and Treatment of AbnormalR01MH104255 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AHMARI, SUSANNE ELIZABETH · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
CIHR MOP-64424NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research with animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) shows the following: (1) Optogenetic studies in mice provide evidence for a plausible cause-effect relation between increased activity in cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) circuits and OCD by demonstrating the induction of compulsive behavior with the experimental manipulation of the CBGTC circuit. (2) Parallel use of several animal models is a fruitful paradigm to examine the mechanisms of treatment effects of deep brain stimulation in distinct OCD endophenotypes. (3) Features of spontaneous behavior in deer mice constitute a rich platform to investigate the neurobiology of OCD, social ramifications of a compulsive phenotype, and test novel drugs. (4) Studies in animal models for psychiatric disorders comorbid with OCD suggest comorbidity may involve shared neural circuits controlling expression of compulsive behavior. (5) Analysis of compulsive behavior into its constitutive components provides evidence from an animal model for a motivational perspective on OCD. (6) Methods of behavioral analysis in an animal model translate to dissection of compulsive rituals in OCD patients, leading to diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderAnimalsBasal GangliaCompulsive BehaviorDeep Brain StimulationDisease Models, AnimalHumansAnimal modelBasal gangliaDeer mouseEndophenotypesNucleus accumbens coreObsessive-compulsive disorderOrbitofrontal cortexQuinpiroleSecurity motivation systemStriatum

Identifiers

PMID27168347
PMCPMC5833926
OpenAlexW2347147710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.