Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168325›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Oral Uptake of Chlamydia psittaci by Ducklings Results in Systemic Dissemination.

Simon Thierry, Fabien Vorimore, Christelle Rossignol, Sabine Scharf, Konrad Sachse, Patricia Berthon, Benoit Durand, Isabelle Virlogeux-Payant, Nicole Borel, Karine Laroucau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon ThierryANSES, Animal Health Laboratory, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Fabien VorimoreANSES, Animal Health Laboratory, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Christelle RossignolINRA, UMR1282 Infectiology and Public Health, Nouzilly, France.
Sabine ScharfFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut (Federal Research Institute for Animal Health), OIE Reference Laboratory for Chlamydiosis, Jena, Germany.
Konrad SachseFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut (Federal Research Institute for Animal Health), OIE Reference Laboratory for Chlamydiosis, Jena, Germany.
Patricia BerthonINRA, UMR1282 Infectiology and Public Health, Nouzilly, France.
Benoit DurandANSES, Animal Health Laboratory, Epidemiology Unit, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Isabelle Virlogeux-PayantINRA, UMR1282 Infectiology and Public Health, Nouzilly, France.
Nicole BorelInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, Zurich, Switzerland.
Karine LaroucauANSES, Animal Health Laboratory, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEInfectiologie Animale et Santé Publique · FRDépartement Santé Animale · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric infections caused by Chlamydia (C.) psittaci are frequent in ducks, but mostly remain subclinical under field conditions. To emulate natural infection, we investigated the pathogenic potential of a C. psittaci field strain in orally inoculated 4-day-old ducklings. Three different challenge doses were tested and seven contact animals were also mock-inoculated with buffer in each group. Over the course of ten days, the birds were monitored for clinical symptoms and chlamydial dissemination before final examination of tissues using histopathology and immunohistochemistry. While the challenge strain disseminated systemically to all internal organs, mild signs of diarrhea were confined to ducklings inoculated with the highest dose (4.3 x 108 IFU/mL, Group 1). No other clinical symptoms or histopathological lesions were seen. The chlamydial load in internal organs as measured by PCR depended on the challenge dose and was unevenly distributed, i.e. high loads in spleen, liver, and distal small and large intestinal tract (ileum, cecum and rectum) vs. ten times lower values in lungs and proximal small intestinal tract (duodenum and jejunum). Notably, the C. psittaci infection of contact birds became evident on day 10 post-infection, with bacterial loads comparable to those of experimentally-infected animals, thus suggesting rapid bird-to-bird transmission of the challenge strain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadChlamydophila psittaciDucksImmunohistochemistryOrgan SpecificityPsittacosis

Identifiers

PMID27168325
PMCPMC4864072
OpenAlexW2358436265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.