Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27168175›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2016

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries.

Ola Rolfson, Kate Eresian Chenok, Eric Bohm, Anne Lübbeke, Geke Denissen, Jennifer Dunn, Stephen Lyman, Patricia Franklin, Michael Dunbar, Søren Overgaard and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A validation study of the 30-day questionnaire in the national Norwegian Tonsil Surgery Register: can we trust the data reported by the patients?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Ola Rolfsona Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Sahlgrenska Academy , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden ;
Kate Eresian Chenokb California Joint Replacement Registry , San Francisco , CA , USA ;
Eric Bohmc Canadian Joint Replacement Registry and University of Manitoba , Winnipeg , Manitoba , Canada ;
Anne Lübbeked Geneva Arthroplasty Registry, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery , Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland ;
Geke Denissene Dutch Arthroplasty Register , Hertogenbosch , the Netherlands ;
Jennifer Dunnf New Zealand Joint Registry and University of Otago , Christchurch , New Zealand ;
Stephen Lymang Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medical College , New York , NY , USA ;
Patricia Franklinh FORCE-TJR and University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , MA , USA ;
Michael Dunbari Canadian Joint Replacement Registry and Dalhousie University , Halifax , Nova Scotia , Canada ;
Søren Overgaardj Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark ;
Göran Garellicka Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Sahlgrenska Academy , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden ;
Jill Dawsonk Nuffield Department of Population Health and University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries
The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register · SEDalhousie University · CADutch Heart Registry · NLHospital for Special Surgery · USJoint Replacement Institute · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

AHRQ HHS P50 HS018910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Steering Committee established the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group to convene, evaluate, and advise on best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs and to support the adoption and use of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty in registries worldwide. The 2 main types of PROMs include generic (general health) PROMs, which provide a measure of general health for any health state, and specific PROMs, which focus on specific symptoms, diseases, organs, body regions, or body functions. The establishment of a PROM instrument requires the fulfillment of methodological standards and rigorous testing to ensure that it is valid, reliable, responsive, and acceptable to the intended population. A survey of the 41 ISAR member registries showed that 8 registries administered a PROMs program that covered all elective hip or knee arthroplasty patients and 6 registries collected PROMs for sample populations; 1 other registry had planned but had not started collection of PROMs. The most common generic instruments used were the EuroQol 5 dimension health outcome survey (EQ-5D) and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12) or the similar Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12). The most common specific PROMs were the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score (UCLA).

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansQuality of LifeRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27168175
PMCPMC4937773
OpenAlexW2384511047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.